Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
What exactly is a safe distance?
Obviously, the defendant didn't do this, else there wouldn't have been a physical altercation in the first place.
The 17 year old responded like a 17 year old would respond when feeling threatened-- which it is clear he did feel threatened. After all, he did attempt to run away from the aggressor.
I hope the prosecution gets to question the defendant. I want him to answer whether or not he approached the 17 year old.
My gut tells me he in fact did apprach the 17 year old-- leading to the altercation where the 17 year old was killed when tried to defend himself. |
Why do you keep saying that GZ approached or attacked TM, there is zero evidence to those statements.
Threaded Mode
