Why not? I mean, if you truly know who these "false prophets" are, and if you've really confronted them about their "doctrine," why wouldn't you reveal who they are? Not revealing who they are only enables these "false prophets" to continue to preach their "doctrine."
You've attacked and maligned Bro. Epley's character, integrity and ministry over what you perceive to be his lack of addressing these "false prophets," yet you wilt and refuse to name any yourself. Could it be you don't really know any by name and haven't confronted them to their face. Simply posting anonymously against them on the internet doesn't count.
BTW, have you been at Bro. Epley's side each time he's been with these alleged "false prophets?" Perhaps Bro. Epley's character is such that instead of posting on the internet against these men, he's spoken to them in person about the "doctrine" they preach. You do realize that it matters more what he may have said in person than anything he could post online.
But that probably didn't cross your mind when you went on your character assassination attack against Bro. Epley.
Why not? I mean, if you truly know who these "false prophets" are, and if you've really confronted them about their "doctrine," why wouldn't you reveal who they are? Not revealing who they are only enables these "false prophets" to continue to preach their "doctrine."
No, folks like you who will not confront their error is what enables them to preach their ungodly and evil doctrine which results in innocent infants and children to suffer and die.
I've found that witnessing individually to people who are involved in such ministries to be the most effective way to battle it. I've been somewhat successful in helping them escape the 'apostolic' movement which practices such error. You cannot count on the ministry in the cult-like sect to openly challenge the error..... I give you the 'reverend' epley as an example.
I use the 'reverend' epley as a poster child of those in the sect. He's typical, choosing to label those who aren't part of their little sect as false prophets but turn a blind eye to the false prophets within their own little group.
Quote:
You've attacked and maligned Bro. Epley's character, integrity and ministry over what you perceive to be his lack of addressing these "false prophets," yet you wilt and refuse to name any yourself. Could it be you don't really know any by name and haven't confronted them to their face. Simply posting anonymously against them on the internet doesn't count.
You asked me, I answered. I did expect you to disbelieve me, but I hoped you would take me at my word. It really doesn't matter, either that is practiced among 'reverend' epley's group or it's not. I know it is. And I know that, hypocritically, folks like 'reverend' epley, and now it seems some on this very forum, choose to ignore the evil and ungodly practice in favor of attempting to justify error.
Quote:
BTW, have you been at Bro. Epley's side each time he's been with these alleged "false prophets?" Perhaps Bro. Epley's character is such that instead of posting on the internet against these men, he's spoken to them in person about the "doctrine" they preach. You do realize that it matters more what he may have said in person than anything he could post online.
But that probably didn't cross your mind when you went on your character assassination attack against Bro. Epley.
Pointing out the 'reverend' epley's error isn't character assassination. The 'reverend' epley has absolutely no problem in pointing out error and false prophets in other groups which isn't part of the little sect he fellowships with. But you'll never see him openly challenge those in his own group. The 'reverend' epley has no problem with character assassination with those who aren't part of his little sect, but that's acceptable with you and others because they're folks with whom you disagree. Disagreement isn't character assassination, pointing out that others are false prophets while ignoring the false prophets in your little sect is hypocritical though.
I understand how the 'apostolic' sect works, I assure you.
no seekerman. this is about you. the fact that you refuse to accept that is quite telling.
it is about you, it is only about you. it is about you deciding what is and is not acceptable.
and you are dancing in the blood of dead babies to make it about you.
Well, let's just see what your position is on those who teach doctrines which result in the suffering and/or death of innocent infants and children. Is such a doctrine evil and ungodly?
I don't expect a straight answer from you. I expect you to revert, as you've done repeatedly now, to your 'apostolic' defense of those in your 'apostolic' sect.
Linear Mode
