End Time Army of Women Preachers Psalms 68:11 - Page 150

rdp · #**1491** 02-22-2014, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha

You can shout it all you want, but you are still missing the point. It's the verb, not the noun, that is being spoken about.

Since this your premise - are you aware that Greek nouns can function as verbs - & vice-versa?

Shall I post a few grammatical quotes for ya'

?

rdp · #**1492** 02-22-2014, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha

What do you call the men who Paul considered his colaborers? What does that mean?

We have explained this Greek term over & over on this thread - go back & do your own homework (the link is even there for you read it yourself). It has absolutely nothing to do with "co-teaching-preaching" alongside the Apostle Paul. Silly argument.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha

Are you attempting to make a point to say that you and/or any other man on this forum is in authority over me?

Women are not to teach-preach to men in the church - & that includes Y-O-U . See how easy that was?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha

Comparing yourself to Jesus? Is that your excuse for your behavior?

Which being interpreted means "I have no response to this other than ridicule" !

Yea', what was I ever thinking appealing to Jesus as an example ?

MissBrattified · #**1493** 02-22-2014, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdp

Hellooooo somebody

!

What he said

!

Wow. You're being very supportive of an incredibly insulting post. I guess you pick and choose when to object to insults.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdp

First, when I was taking Greek, the professor (Dr. William Mounce) stated that this text (i.e., I Tim. 3.1) should be translated as "faithful to his wife" - as most translations do. The Greek text literally reads "one-woman-man."

Second, is a patently absurd argument to suggest that a man must be married to fulfill these requirements - & totally destroys the intended context - which is simply that an overseer should live a life above reproach.

Point is - woman were not even considered as either overseers or deacons in the Bible.

Sorry, try again

.

If it simply means a man being faithful to his wife, then it could easily be extrapolated to mean fidelity in general and could apply to either male or female.

You say "try again" as if this is settled. Here's the deal: You and others aren't as persuasive as you like to think, or you would have won this argument pages and pages ago.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdp

Your pastor does not allow women to teach-preach to men in his pulpit..."LOL".

Isn't Bro. Alvear her pastor?

rdp · #**1494** 02-22-2014, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

Wow. You're being very supportive of an incredibly insulting post. I guess you pick and choose when to object to insults.

Yea' kinda' like the AFF "Admin." eh' ?

Quote:

If it simply means a man being faithful to his wife, then it could easily be extrapolated to mean fidelity in general and could apply to either male or female.

Ummm, one wee lil' problem with that - all of the personal pronouns are translated in the masculine gender because of the context of ruling his own house, etc., etc. Sorry - Try again.

Quote:

You say "try again" as if this is settled. Here's the deal: You and others aren't as persuasive as you like to think, or you would have won this argument pages and pages ago.

Ohh, I see, the validity of an argument rests on how many pages the issue is "debated" ? Go try that on the forums where they "debate" whether or not sodomites are "Christians" & see where that logic lands you ?

Quote:

Isn't Bro. Alvear her pastor?

?

Sasha · #**1495** 02-22-2014, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdp

Since this your premise - are you aware that Greek nouns can function as verbs - & vice-versa?

Shall I post a few grammatical quotes for ya'

?

So can English words when used in that context. You cannot have a sentence where a noun is used but claim it's a verb in that same sentence.

Sasha · #**1496** 02-22-2014, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdp

We have explained this Greek term over & over on this thread - go back & do your own homework (the link is even there for you read it yourself). It has absolutely nothing to do with "co-teaching-preaching" alongside the Apostle Paul. Silly argument.

So tell me, who were Paul's colaborers that were not teaching/preaching with Paul?

Quote:

Women are not to teach-preach to men in the church - & that includes Y-O-U . See how easy that was?

What does that have to do with what I said? I'm not preaching here, nor do I preach anywhere. And this isn't church.

Quote:

Which being interpreted means "I have no response to this other than ridicule" !

Yea', what was I ever thinking appealing to Jesus as an example ?

I don't think Jesus would be happy with you comparing yourself to Him, especially your behavior on this forum.

rdp · #**1497** 02-22-2014, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha

So can English words when used in that context. You cannot have a sentence where a noun is used but claim it's a verb in that same sentence.

Not in identity, but perhaps in function - not saying that's even the case since I did not see the particular passage in question, just caught your claim & wanted to point this out.

rdp · #**1498** 02-22-2014, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha

So tell me, who were Paul's colaborers that were not teaching/preaching with Paul?

What does that have to do with what I said? I'm not preaching here, nor do I preach anywhere. And this isn't church.

I don't think Jesus would be happy with you comparing yourself to Him, especially your behavior on this forum.

LOL - Nice Socratic-method you got going on there (sure you're not a JW?)- not buying into it.

Answer is still the same - go back & take a look on this thread where I specifically explicated the role of Paul's "co-laborers" - Will not sit here & chase your silly rabbit-trails all night...esp. when I have already covered this in detail on this same thread (going to supper soon anyway).

RJR · #**1499** 02-22-2014, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RJR

Sis Alvear, I have witnessed it is your style to make statements about a passage and when someone ask you a question or offers a rebuttal to your claims, you either completely ignore the question or rebuttal and come back with another post intended to elicit sympathy or change subjects.

I would like to ask you a question about 1 Tim 2. Is it speaking only of a husband and wife relationship and the home?

Sis Alvear, for the third time could you answer the question?

Sasha · #**1500** 02-22-2014, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdp

Not in identity, but perhaps in function - not saying that's even the case since I did not see the particular passage in question, just caught your claim & wanted to point this out.

It's the difference in witnessing (i.e. sharing the gospel) and being a witness (whether by observance or having a place).

And I thought you were reading this thread....