Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowas
Scripturally (Jesus) speaking, it cannot be Rome or any other city for precisely the verses Mike Blume presented. Rome in no way was or can be construde to be guilty of all the righteous blood all the way back to Able.
|
Right TWO cannot have ALL. It's either Jerusalem who had ALL according to Jesus or NO ONE ELSE! ANYONE ELSE who slew saints after Jesus spoke those words could only have PART of the blood shed on earth.
Sean,
HOW CAN ROME HAVE IT ALL, when Jesus said Jerusalem did? Do you know what ALL means? If you had ALL THE LEGOS (lol) ever created up to that time back in 2008, who could anyone else LATER say they have them ALL? They don't have what you had! They cannot have ALL.
Threaded Mode
