Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


View Poll Results: Is Jesus both a Human Being and God today?
YES He is still a human being, albeit an immortal man while He is also God. 14 82.35%
NO, He is no longer a human being, but solely GOD. 3 17.65%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-05-2014, 09:36 AM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: POLL: Does the "MAN" Jesus Christ still exist

BUMP. Sean, please respond to each of my points.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
Sean, let me explain what I believe before you put words in my mouth,

Rev 1 is symbolic. How do I know? As I stated, the sword from Jesus' mouth is directly related to Heb 4:12 that says God's word is sharper than any twoedged Sword.

It symbolizes the WORD. Get it? From the mouth?

Secondly, Jesus flatly stated symbols to John.
Revelation 1:20 KJV The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.
The candlesticks he was standing in SYMBOLIZED THE SEVEN CHURCHES. The stars in his hand SYMBOLIZED THE SEVEN ANGELS OF THE CHURCHES.

John actually saw with his eyes a seven candlesticks and seven stars in His hand, like he saw the sword form his mouth. But the candlesticks and stars were symbolic. John saw a VISION. Symbolic.

The seven churches were actual churches. Rev 2-3 were chapters where THE VISION OF CHAPTER 1 had Jesus TELLING HIM TO WRITE words to seven churches. John did not see seven churches in a vision, except for the seven candlesticks that symbolized those churches in Chapter 1. HE HEARD WORDS that he was told to write in Chapters 2 and 3. He did not see seven churches in Chapters 2-3. He just heard words to write to those churches.

And Rev 1:10 says he was in the SPIRIT. That shows us it was a VISION. He said the same thing Rev 17:3 where the Spirit carried him away IN THE SPIRIT to the wilderness where he saw a monster with a whore riding it's back.

He was in the spirit, meaning IT WAS A VISION.

SYMBOLIC, Sean.

Chapter 4-5 is another vision. THE LAMB has seven eyes and horns and goes to the one on the throne. If you do not believe chapters 4 and 5 were visions, then you must believe we will see TWO IN HEAVEN... the Father sitting on the throne and the LAMB approaching the Father. But the truth is that is a symbolic vision and we are not going to see TWO. God is ONE. We will only see the BODY OF JESUS, but never God the Father because God is a Spirit who is everywhere. You cannot see someone who is everywhere or else you would not be able to see past the surface of your eyeballs. So, John saw a symbolic vision of Jesus as LAMB and HIGH PRIEST BOTH going into the holiest of holies which is heaven. And he made atonement for us like the high priest alone could only go into the holiest in the Old Testament. That's why no one was worthy to go to the throne and take the book except THE SEVEN-EYED LAMB IN REV 5:3.

It is symbolic.



You symbolize it yourself! You said Rev 4:1-WAS THE RAPTURE, when in reality ONLY JOHN WAS CAUGHT UP. If only John was caught up at the voice of the trumpet, and the church was still on earth when John saw that, and you say it is the rapture, then you are saying JOHN'S CATCHING UP is SYMBOLIC of the church.



It was a VISION John saw where a hand touched him. If it wasn't then, why did Jesus say that the same right hand that touched him also held seven stars that were the ANGELS OF THE SEVEN CHURCHES? When John wrote the letters to the seven churches in chapters 2-3, he addressed the angel of each church. Is there a STAR in each church, and is each church a literal CANDLESTICK? You do not read everything in the chapter, Sean.

Did John take the letters he wrote and to those seven churches and hand them to each of the candlesticks he saw Jesus stand in? Did Jesus intend for John to write a letter and actually give it to one the candlesticks instead of sending it to an actual congregation in Asia Minor? You said none of it is symbolic! That means Jesus wanted him to write a letter to a CANDLESTICK!



So what? RAPTURE is never used in the entire bible and you believe in it.

It is clearly a VISION, because John was in a CAVE and suddenly saw the golden candlesticks from the Tabernacle IN THE CAVE with Jesus holding stars. And Jesus told him the candlesticks were the churches and the stars were the angels of the churches. But you do not think it is symbolic so for you must believe there were not seven real churches
and actual since in this case CANDLESTICKS were distinctly said by Jesus to be churches, and that cannot be symbolic since you said the word VISION was not mentioned.

So which is it?



So, in that case a revelation of the churches being candlesticks must mean they are not actual churches but candlesticks with fires, and no people involved at all! And Jesus has seven stars that are angels of those churches. Not actual beings but impersonal STARS.

You really have quite a doctrine, Sean. It's quite a revelation, indeed, to now know that churches are not congregations, but candlesticks. Silly us!



It says the revelation of Jesus THAT WAS SIGNIFIED TO JOHN. In other words the Revelation of Jesus was revealed to John BY SIGNS, not actualities. Like Jesus in candlesticks WAS A SIGN that Jesus is in the midst of the churches, as we read about in Rev 2:1.

If this is not symbolic then you have to say that Jesus was literally in non-symbolic candlesticks, where congregations and people have nothing to do with it like actual churches that we are familiar with. Churches to JESUS in Rev 1 were not congregations of people in certain cities, but CAnLDESTICKS.

However, John was in PATMOS and Jesus said one of the candlestick churches was in EPHESUS. Was EPHESUS actually in that cave, too? Was the actual congregation physically taken tot he isle of Patmos and turned into a candlestick for an hour or so while John watched the non-symbolic scene? After all, he said the churches that were actually candlesticks were IN THOSE CITIES. But John saw them in the cave at patmos!

Can you explain how the churches can be in Patmos at the same time they're in seven different cities?

What about all the other CITIES these churches were in? Were these cities ABSENT OF THE CHURCH CONGREGATIONS, since Jesus took them and changed them into actual non-symbolic candlesticks and stood inside them in the cave with John? Or was the CAVE'S position where ONE candlestick stood, actually Thyatira. And a few feet away where the other candlestick stood the city of EPHESUS was there in the cave? In other words, ALL THESE CITIES WHERE THE CHURCHES WERE must have been inside that little cave, since you said none of it is symbolic.

For Jesus to tell John to write to the church in Ephesus was really silly, you must think. The church was right there in the cave and was turned into a candlestick! Why would he have to write to it if it was right there as that candlestick? Why did John simply go to the candlestick and tell it the words of Jesus.

Oh, maybe it could hear Jesus itself, since Jesus was in the midst of the candlesticks that he said were churches. But why would he tell john to write to them if they could hear the words of Jesus standing right there in the cave anyway? Oh, right! Candlesticks do not have EARS! But how could they read letters if they ere non-symbolic candlesticks?

Whew, you have quite the doctrine, Sean! Please explain that to us!




Sorry, I believed this was a vision long before I knew anything about preterism LIKE ANY OTHER PERSON READILY KNOWS, Sean.

lol

Anyone futurist or preterist KNOWS THAT WAS A VISION, but for some reason you are the lone ranger who disagrees! To you, the seven churches are not congregations, but actual candlesticks!



Sure did! I guess John w as wrong as well when he was told churches are not congregations, silly John. They are CANDLESTICKS! Non-symbolic candlesticks. And although John did not likely now it before, non-symbolic STARS CAN READ LETTERS! No wonder people started talking to the stars at night! They must have agreed with you that they are angels of churches out there in the dark nightsky!
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-05-2014, 09:45 AM
Sean Sean is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 23,543
Re: POLL: Does the "MAN" Jesus Christ still exist

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
Ok. It is TRUTH that churches that John wrote to were not congregations of people, but CNADLESTICKS! And the angels of the churches were STARS in reality. Twinkle twinkle.

And seven cities of Asia Minor were on little old Patmos that day. And John had letters that were not meant to be read to PEOPLE but candlesticks!

There you go, Sean's voice of truth!

Is anyone counting how many posts Sean will write before he addresses ONE POINT I made about the alleged non-symbolic nature of Rev 1? We could lose count!


Mike, there is some symbolism used in the 1st 3 chapters indeed.

I must clarify that I was lead into this by using the word "vision" as "revelation" and turning it into "symbolism".

I apologize for implying that there is No symbolism at all in the 1st 3 chapters.

The point I was originally making was the difference between Johns' "REVELATION" of Jesus and your presupposed "VISION" of Jesus.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-05-2014, 09:46 AM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: POLL: Does the "MAN" Jesus Christ still exist

Sean, you said Jesus looks quite different, and homed in on Rev 1 as we spoke of the MAN Jesus. So, I said that was symbolic. And you said NOPE. None of Rev 1 is symbolic. So I showed you where IT INDEED IS, and you will not eve respond to any of those points, but resorted to namecalling what I believe. You always do that, don't you?



Well, I guess I better abandon our church congregation and locate a candlestick somewhere.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-05-2014, 09:46 AM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: POLL: Does the "MAN" Jesus Christ still exist

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean View Post
Mike, there is some symbolism used in the 1st 3 chapters indeed.

I must clarify that I was lead into this by using the word "vision" as "revelation" and turning it into "symbolism".

I apologize for implying that there is No symbolism at all in the 1st 3 chapters.

The point I was originally making was the difference between Johns' REVELATION of Jesus and your presupposed "VISION" of Jesus.
No, you were trying to say JESUS LOOKS DIFFERENT NOW by using Rev 1 where you said were NO SYMBOLS.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-05-2014, 09:51 AM
Sean Sean is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 23,543
Re: POLL: Does the "MAN" Jesus Christ still exist

Mike look at this......this is the REAL Jesus returning...

Rev 19:11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.

12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.

13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.

14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King Of Kings, And Lord Of Lords.


This is a REAL Jesus returning to a REAL earth.

I only can PRESUPPOSE that this same sword in Rev. 1 is not real, but symbolic. But I have NO proof, so I must take the Bible literal.


You may not believe this, but the preterist believes that every bit of the above passage is symbolic of something else!(fake armies, fake clothing on Jesus, fake sword, fake horses, fake nations, fake flaming eyes, fake crowns, etc.)


It is all just a great big PRESUPPOSITION with no Biblical reference to say otherwise than it is literal!

Last edited by Sean; 11-05-2014 at 10:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-05-2014, 09:53 AM
Sean Sean is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 23,543
Re: POLL: Does the "MAN" Jesus Christ still exist

Same sword as in Rev.19...Rev 1:16 And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.

Last edited by Sean; 11-05-2014 at 10:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-05-2014, 09:56 AM
Sean Sean is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 23,543
Re: POLL: Does the "MAN" Jesus Christ still exist

Remember Mike, the "deeper" ways(thought processes) of "you know who" are ready to jump on you...look out!!!

Last edited by Sean; 11-05-2014 at 10:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-05-2014, 11:49 AM
KeptByTheWord's Avatar
KeptByTheWord KeptByTheWord is offline
On the road less traveled


 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: On a mountain... somewhere
Posts: 8,369
Re: POLL: Does the "MAN" Jesus Christ still exist

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
Jesus is not a thing. Jesus is a Person. That verse explains Jesus is the same Person He has always been. He is Eternal

I answered 1) on the poll but I want to add I prefer the wording to refer to Jesus not merely as an immortal Human being but a glorified human being, having been changed. He is still Human in nature.

That change includes both His human body and a change to our sin nature when we are changed too
I agree.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-05-2014, 07:52 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: POLL: Does the "MAN" Jesus Christ still exist

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean View Post
Same sword as in Rev.19...Rev 1:16 And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.
That is symbolic, too. It's the WORD going forth fulfilling the judgment He spoke.

Sean, you said I propose supposition. Explain to me how it is supposition to take a clear reference to the word from the mouth of the Lord as a sword in Heb 4:12 and say that is what the symbol represents? I never said anything about fake nations, etc. You go too far in your accusations and put words in our mouths and actually start lying, Sean. Why do you do that? Why do you not say we believe what we actually say we do, instead of telling these fibs we do not believe?
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."

Last edited by mfblume; 11-05-2014 at 07:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-05-2014, 08:04 PM
Sean Sean is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 23,543
Re: POLL: Does the "MAN" Jesus Christ still exist

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
That is symbolic, too. It's the WORD going forth fulfilling the judgment He spoke.

Sean, you said I propose supposition. Explain to me how it is supposition to take a clear reference to the word from the mouth of the Lord as a sword in Heb 4:12 and say that is what the symbol represents? I never said anything about fake nations, etc. You go too far in your accusations and put words in our mouths and actually start lying, Sean. Why do you do that? Why do you not say we believe what we actually say we do, instead of telling these fibs we do not believe?




Your presupposition is underlined above...When you say something is not real, but symbolic. You are saying it does not really exist. That makes it fake.

All of the symbolism preterism proposes is mostly symbolic explanations of literal prophecies.

It is saying these things you read are not real things, they mean something else, just like your statement underlined.

You are saying that the Lord has a Fake sword proceeding from His mouth defined in Rev 1 and Rev 19, if you think it is only symbolic, and not real.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why we cannot "co-exist" with the Left Originalist Political Talk 27 05-07-2013 05:32 PM
Poll: Who is the Real "Standards"? Ev. Duane Williams Fellowship Hall 27 06-19-2010 06:47 PM
Remove "In God We Trust" Poll rgcraig Fellowship Hall 16 08-26-2008 03:24 PM
What Does "Joint" or "Fellow" Heirs with Christ? Praxeas Fellowship Hall 2 01-13-2008 01:12 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.