My point

[phareztamar]

Originally Posted by Lafon

I agree wholeheartedly! It IS a matter of the "blood" that was the differential aspect of the "Son of man" which set Him apart from mankind.

The "blood" is the ONLY thing that the fetus creates via its own bone marrow, and is also the ONLY thing that does NOT pass between mother and fetus by way of the umbilical cord.

Because the "blood" of the Christ child, Emmanuel, was sinless, then the shedding of that blood was the ONLY acceptable sacrifice the Father would accept in atoning for the sins of all mankind.

However, with that being stated, I would enjoy reading your explanation of His fleshly substance. Was it also sinless, unlike that of all mankind?

If he was made like us, then his fleshly substance is no different than yours. But what corrupts the flesh is sin...more specifically the law of sin. That law of sin is passed from father to child via the laws of pro-creation...those 23 chromosomes that the father brings to the table...and as I stated, resides in that 90,000 miles of tubing inside you that feeds oxygen...the breath of life...to every single part of the fleshly substance. If that blood is infected with the law of sin, then is the fleshly substance corrupted. Such are all since Adam.

In Jesus, this was not the case. The 23 chromosomes provided by God did not have the law of sin infection that is passed by the father at conception. And as you know, since all babies produce their own blood supply...untainted by the mothers blood...then the sinless blood flowing in Jesus' veins was life to the fleshly substance, and not death.