Quote:
Originally Posted by Fionn mac Cumh
The 14th is plain enough not to require any more amendments. Like I said, have we not evolved enough as a society, that we need have amendments for civil rights issues?
Does any law deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, or equal protection of the law? If so, its unconstitutional and should be changed. its not that hard.
|
Again, you do not even know the context of the 14th Amendment's mentioning of life, liberty and property.
Keeping the only definition of marriage in a law is not a violation of a civil right.
By your definition laws prohibiting public nudity are a violation of the 14th Amendment.
Threaded Mode
