Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
Bowas, please consider the source. This is the same Sean who proved in the eschatology section that he had not the foggiest idea what he was talking about when it concerned eschatology. The same Sean you created an entire thread with information cut and pasted off the internet, all of which he never took the time to examine before posting. The same Sean, who brought Gail Riplinger to defend a 17th century translation of the Bible, and the same Sean who places all Apostolic elders (who have past on to their reward) in burning flames because they taught tithing. Sean, wouldn't know Preterism or Classical Dispensationalism if they were 50 lb dumbbells and they fell on his head.  |
Yeah. I'm trying to get a grasp on how he comes to his conclusions, but so far it's evaded me.
He did give me a couple of rules, then he seemed to have contradicted himself then claimed the rules can change.
I will continue as Peter Falk in Columbo and try to crack this case.
Usually one comes to their conclusions based on a set of parameters or rules, that while they may incorrect or need some adjustments, still there would be a set of guidelines.
So far, his rules are kind of willy-nilly, or appear to be so.
Threaded Mode
