Terrorist Attacks In Paris

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Sorry, I dont believe anything has been shown to be "full of misrepresentations"...

Are you kidding me? Wait, you're not kidding...

Mistakes can be made. Mistakes are not indications of a conspiracy.

A small error gets blown way out of proportion into a "full of misrepresentation", then into a vast conspiracy by the government, then into an Illuminati conspiracy...

I am not talking about 'errors and mistakes' that are to be expected. I am talking about evidence conveniently disappearing, witnesses amazingly showing up dead shortly after certain events, drills taking place at the same time and in the same locations as certain 'horrible events', normal security measures conveniently and suddenly and inexplicably lapsing just in time for the 'event' and explanations either not forthcoming at all or perhaps a shrugging of the shoulders and a 'oops' being offered along with 'fixes' being put in place that are conveniently a little step or two closer to what used to be called 'communist, nazi, fascist, monarchist tyranny 1984 style', you know, stuff like that.

Oh, and the existence of 'crisis actors' (whole companies devoted to such things!) who are contracted with the federal government for the express purpose of creating 'realistic training scenarios' and even briefing materials for the participants and local news media that specifically state the training episode will include 'simulated news coverage' in order to make everything as 'realistic' as possible, included ongoing media participation AFTER the training drill is completed, amazingly coincidental synchronisms of certain people in various different events (what are the chances? Go figure!), lack of evidence being presented, crime scenes being almost immediately bulldozed and 'cleaned up' contrary to all known and established forensic procedures, characters showing up on the news as 'experts' who it is discovered later on don't even 'exist' as whoever they were claimed to be, 'crazy shooters' who seem to have no existence for years prior to their going off the wagon, said crazy people almost always having a connection to either military or other federal government psychiatric experiemental programs or persons involved in such programs (Columbine? Hello? Hello?), yada yada yada....

Just today a Muslim told me 9/11 was a Free Mason orchestrated event...crazy..

Why is that crazy? I mean REALLY, stop and ask yourself, 'Why do I immediately believe this is crazy?' A group of Masons plotting horrible crimes vs a group of Muslims plotting horrible crimes.... why is one crazy but the other is absolutely believable? And why is one poo-pooed by both government and media - a government and media that have proven they are untrustworthy, have an agenda, are opposed to actually telling the truth about anything they speak about, etc, and the other is unanimously promoted by the same groups as the uncontestable truth... and what is promoted as truth is conveniently good for BUSINESS and just coincidently (wow, whodathunkit?) profitable for said groups, and actually is profiting them financially?

there is this guy on my friends list who believes all these crazy conspiracies about 9/11, except the simplest one...that a bunch of Jihadist took control and flew those planes into the Twin Towers...YET, yet he believes at the same time that there are 19 jihadist training camps in America right now hell bent on continuing 9/11 throughout the US...

Do you realise that your 'simplest theory' is actually the most unrealistic and does not fit the known facts? Hey, here's a meme that actually makes a good point about that: