That's why ... if theologians can't agree ... I think it's simply fishing to have one's paradigm to fit the Word ....
There isn't enough here to formulate an Angelic Hair or Uncut Hair doctrine ... me thinks that those that seek to interpret "because of the angels" do so to advance their erroneous agenda
I find it funny that when people change their beliefs when being saved, we don't consider them to be in rebellion or deception concerning their prior beliefs and teachings, but instead, we are showing them 'truth'. It's when they quit believing what we consider 'truth' that they are then in rebellion or deception.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
I find it funny that when people change their beliefs when being saved, we don't consider them to be in rebellion or deception concerning their prior beliefs and teachings, but instead, we are showing them 'truth'. It's when they quit believing what we consider 'truth' that they are then in rebellion or deception.
The issue here is usurping unbiblical authority .... It's what I call the Ministry of Caiphas ... agree w/ me or else ....
1. Does "for this cause" refer to the fallen angels?
2. Does a woman's cut hair identify her as rebellious to her husband and God?
3. Does the woman join league with the enemy against her husband when she cuts it? After all, the serpent's goal was to steal earthly dominion from the man.
1. Does "for this cause" refer to the fallen angels?
2. Does a woman's cut hair identify her as rebellious to her husband and God?
3. Does the woman join league with the enemy against her husband when she cuts it? After all, the serpent's goal was to steal earthly dominion from the man.
I don't believe this is the intent of most women who cut their hair.
A woman who has been taught against cutting her hair generally does it out of rebellion.
But most women just do it for style or convenience otherwise.
I have noticed that when an Apostolic woman backslides, one of the first things she usually does is cut her hair.
I don't believe this is the intent of most women who cut their hair.
A woman who has been taught against cutting her hair generally does it out of rebellion.
But most women just do it for style or convenience otherwise.
I have noticed that when an Apostolic woman backslides, one of the first things she usually does is cut her hair.
But is that rebellion?
It may be that she no longer identifies with Apostolic doctrine. It may have nothing to do with her relationship with her hubby. The million dollar question is does her intent matter? Is 1 Corinthians 11 a biblical imperative, or merely a suggestion?
It may be that she no longer identifies with Apostolic doctrine. It may have nothing to do with her relationship with her hubby. The million dollar question is does her intent matter? Is 1 Corinthians 11 a biblical imperative, or merely a suggestion?
Very good point, PP. It is not necessarily rebellion, but interpreted as such by some.
Very good point, PP. It is not necessarily rebellion, but interpreted as such by some.
If the woman has once belived it and then cuts her hair, it is one of two things: rebellion or deception.
Rebellion if she still believes but cuts it anyway, and deception if she has convinced herself or allowed others to convince her it is no longer truth.
It may be that she no longer identifies with Apostolic doctrine. It may have nothing to do with her relationship with her hubby. The million dollar question is does her intent matter? Is 1 Corinthians 11 a biblical imperative, or merely a suggestion?
I said "generally."
If she has once believed it and no longer does, that would be deception, which often has its roots in rebellion or offense.
Hybrid Mode
