|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|

06-04-2007, 06:02 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Hutchinson
Why did Paul mention the hair deal in his letter to The Corinthian believers ,and not mention it in his other Epistles ?
What significance did this have to the church in Corinth ?
What is the background behind Paul's explaination to the church ?
|
Everything Paul dealt with to the Corinthians was outward issues, since they were too carnal for him to deal with them spiritually.
Favouring certain preachers, taking each other to court, abusing communion supper, tolerance of people fornicating with parents, marriage and being single, eating meats offered to idols in idol temples, disallowing preachers a financial income from church, chaos and disorderliness with use of gifts of Spirit, disbelief about future physical resurrection of Church, handling offerings for poor, etc. AND HAIR AND COVERINGS.
And look what topics on forums get the most traffic in light of the above. lol.
Let the Corinthians RULE.
|

06-04-2007, 06:06 PM
|
|
Superheros are evil...
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 785
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
Everything Paul dealt with to the Corinthians was outward issues, since they were too carnal for him to deal with them spiritually. ....
|
Although I appreciate the thought pattern, he did deal with some inward, spiritual issues as well.
But the majority does seem to be outward issues...
|

06-04-2007, 07:44 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by "GL"
Although I appreciate the thought pattern, he did deal with some inward, spiritual issues as well.
But the majority does seem to be outward issues...
|
I just thought of this verse:
1Co 3:1-2 KJV And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. (2) I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.
|

06-04-2007, 08:34 PM
|
|
Non-Resident Redneck
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Hutchinson
Why did Paul mention the hair deal in his letter to The Corinthian believers ,and not mention it in his other Epistles ?
What significance did this have to the church in Corinth ?
What is the background behind Paul's explaination to the church ?
|
Why did Paul mention communion in the same chapter, but not in his other epistles?
Were they the only ones who needed to take communion?
|

06-04-2007, 08:39 PM
|
 |
Resident PeaceMaker
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jackson,AL.
Posts: 16,548
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
Why did Paul mention communion in the same chapter, but not in his other epistles?
Were they the only ones who needed to take communion?
|
Apparently the other churches did not have a probelm in their services with taking communion.
So did Paul just out of thin air mention hair to the Corinthian congreagation ?
__________________
People who are always looking for fault,can find it easily all they have to do,is look into their mirror.
There they can find plenty of fault.
|

06-04-2007, 08:48 PM
|
|
Non-Resident Redneck
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Hutchinson
Apparently the other churches did not have a probelm in their services with taking communion.
So did Paul just out of thin air mention hair to the Corinthian congreagation ?
|
Apparently it wasn't a problem in other churches.
He told them that if they wanted to argue about it, that there was no other custom observed by the churches of God.
|

06-04-2007, 10:24 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
Why did Paul mention communion in the same chapter, but not in his other epistles?
Were they the only ones who needed to take communion?
|
Maybe because it was SYMBOLIC in communion as it is in the covering, and it is a carnal issue as he was not apt to speak about spiritual things in 1 Cor. It seems 2 Cor advances more, but chapter 3 specifically said he could not speak about spiritual things at that time of writing that epistle to them.
|

06-05-2007, 12:45 AM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
Why did Paul mention communion in the same chapter, but not in his other epistles?
Were they the only ones who needed to take communion?
|
They may have been the only ones NOT doing it and needed correction or they were the only ones doing it wrong and needed correction...
Then again, as we all know, letters were knowingly shared with other churches...Maybe Paul did not feel he needed to make specific letter to other churches
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|

06-05-2007, 08:15 AM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
They may have been the only ones NOT doing it and needed correction or they were the only ones doing it wrong and needed correction...
Then again, as we all know, letters were knowingly shared with other churches...Maybe Paul did not feel he needed to make specific letter to other churches
|
Also the order and regulation of the gifts are only found in Corinthians. But does that mean the instructions are not for the church in general????
Communion is NOT for Corinthians only yet this passage proves it's continuance and order.
Concerning the covering for ladies Paul makes it clear "NEITHER THE CHURCHES OF GOD." A church that allows women to be uncovered in worship is NOT a Church of God!
So all these subjects rise and fall on the importance of each other.
CHARITY is defined NO where else but here was charity only for the Corinthians?? It is certainly mentioned other places but only defined here.
|

06-04-2007, 10:49 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Hutchinson
Why did Paul mention the hair deal in his letter to The Corinthian believers ,and not mention it in his other Epistles ?
What significance did this have to the church in Corinth ?
What is the background behind Paul's explaination to the church ?
|
Why did the apostle Paul mention this issue of headship, and then go right into addressing the Corinthian church's abuse of the observance of the Lord's Supper?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 PM.
| |