Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
The verb is HAVE and it does not point to the action of growing but possessing. And that means the idea of not cutting is still not there. Again, the same phrase or word is used in verse 15. So whatever you say about verse 16 definition has to be applied to be verse 15 and the men.
It still means men cannot do what women can do. And if you restrict it to CUTTING then a man with hair down his back that trims it is okay. And we both disagree that is okay. So, it cannot be uncut.
|
"have" hair that has been let to grow. If long hair simply means "long hair" you still have the same problem. Would shoulder length hair on a man be considered long?
Threaded Mode
