Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13  
Old 03-13-2016, 12:01 AM
n david n david is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17,807
Re: America 2016: Free Speech for a selected few.

Quote:
Originally Posted by votivesoul View Post
Whether or not charges will be forthcoming, disturbing the peace, incitement to riot, disorderly conduct, and such misdemeanors? How bad did it really get, that no one has seen? Assault?
I looked up some Chicago ordinances:

8-24-1, Disorderly Conduct:
A person commits disorderly conduct when he knowingly:
A. Breach Of The Peace: Does any act in such unreasonable manner as to alarm or disturb another and to provoke a breach of the peace;


While this occurred in Nevada, this would apply to "provoking a breach of the peace," IMO

https://youtu.be/2yhZZwVAqMg


8-24-5: - BATTERY:
A person commits battery if he intentionally or knowingly without legal justification and by any means: 1) causes bodily harm to an individual, or 2) makes physical contact of an insulting or provoking nature with an individual.

and

8-24-5A: - ASSAULT:
A person commits an assault when, without lawful authority, he engages in conduct which places another in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery.

Again, not in Chicago, but this likely applied even in the city where the dude with the ponytail did this

https://youtu.be/AoA_mjVrvs4


8-24-7: - DISTURBING ASSEMBLAGES:
It shall be unlawful for any person to disturb any lawful assemblage or gathering in the City.

Protesters may be charged with this. I disagree a lot with this ordinance, because it gives no allowance for any type of protest.


8-24-32: - MOB ACTION:
It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in mob action. Mob action consists of any of the following:

A. The use of force or violence disturbing the public peace by two (2) or more persons acting together and without authority of law;


I have yet to see acts of violence from the protesters, but if there was any, this could apply.


8-24-37: - CRIMINAL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY:
A. Prohibited Acts: A person violates this Section when he performs any of the following acts:

1. Knowingly damages any property of another without his consent;


I couldn't find the definition of property, but, depending on the definition, the Trump supporters shown in footage trying to rip and destroy the protesters flags and banners could be guilty of this.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Watched Obama's America, "2016". crakjak Fellowship Hall 6 11-05-2012 10:26 PM
Free Speech Under Attack! deacon blues Political Talk 4 09-18-2012 04:01 PM
UK street preacher arrested for his free speech Apocrypha Fellowship Hall 2 05-03-2010 06:25 AM
Bill Clinton against free speech? Jaxon Fellowship Hall 3 02-14-2009 09:31 AM
Liberal's best arguments protected free speech Praxeas The Newsroom 0 05-26-2007 03:30 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.