You not preaching holiness till you've named it!

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by good samaritan

We are still speaking two different languages.

Jewel's were associated by carnal people as God's blessing. So, therefore God communicated in terms they could understand.

By God using those terms it had nothing to do with license of neither walking naked or wearing jewelry.

Jewels were associated by God as godly blessings in Ezekiel 16.

And God's use of them does indeed show license. And walking naked was shameful and used to show something shameful, and if jewels were ungodly they'd be used to show something ungodly.

If I am missing something you're saying then please explain, but let's not get into the insulting going on by others here. Not sure why they make it personal.

Shame of walking naked (a negative) points to shame of Egypt taken captive (a negative). Unlike you allegation that jewels (a negative) are used to show something godly (a positive). There is no comparison to nakedness and the jewel picture.