Quote:
Originally Posted by shazeep
hmm, i think anarchy works great, been doing it for years now. Of course "no ruler" means no earthly ruler, but you have had it conflated with chaos since forever, even though it also does not mean "no rules." Not sure how else one could pursue a Theonomy, actually, or how you are going to avoid politicizing it, like the definition--which was the first one i could find--seems to indicate? But i am convinced this mostly arises due to the demonization of the concept Anarchy. Which btw has never failed, that i am aware of.
Do you have an example of it not working? Because i think we could both agree pretty quick that when all else fails, anarchy is exactly what you are going to do, even if you might prefer to call it something else. Seems to work well for the Amish, Quakers, Mennonites etc.
|
Do you drive a car? Have a driver license? Legally mandated insurance? Follow traffic laws? Do you stop for the police when they tell you to?
You do not live in anarchy unless you live on a deserted island. You do not understand what the political theory called "anarchy" actually is.
Try actually living AS IF there is no earthly government having any jurisdiction over you. You will be in jail within a week, tops.
Threaded Mode
