More on Skirts

[Godsdrummer]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Sadly it looks like Lies are news, and Truth is obsolete. In a world where that is happening we then mildly joke as the place falls down around our ears. All it takes is propaganda pushed on you over a couple of decades. Not about Burkas and sunglasses, it is about crossdressing. Deuteronomy 22:5 is about crossdressing. Which while everyone was trying to prove that Matthew was originally written in Hebrew, and that Matthew 28:19 was inserted by a Catholic priest. Little Billy was feeling girlish one morning? So, his mommy dressed him up like his sister Kathy. Pretty extreme? No, because Billy left the house looking like a mini lumber jack, because what you didn't expect is that Billy's sister is what you all loved to call a "Tom Boy." So, girlish to Billy is looking rugged and manly. Because the poor little dude wasn't taught any better by his Apostolic minister. No, this is about a female wearing a garbage bag over her body, not by a long shot. It is about young females and males going beyond transgenderism, all the way to postgenderism.

The mainstream churchisms were adopted by some Apostolics back in the 80s, they started to go online and mock their attire of separation. They ended up where they are today. Policing anyone who holds the "old line" by saying that Jesus didn't state "women wear dresses and men wear suits" in the Hebrew New Testament. therefore they Humpty Dumpty right off the wall of common sense. Yet, the King's horses and the King's men don't even bother trying to put them together anymore. Because Humpty likes it.

After following this thread for a while now, I must say the bolded part of this statement is the truth. Deut. 22:5, is about cross dressing. But it is not about the cut or design of the clothes as much as the intended purpose. No one can deny that a Scottish kilt was made for a man, any more than a woman's polyester opposite side zippered pants were made for a women.

I do not believe Deut. 22:5 has anything to do with pants on women. That is mans interpretation. Neither is separation from the world mean standing out like a sore thumb from the rest of the world. If it was where was this separation of clothing in the bible days?

On the other hand, I agree that those that seem to think they have liberty to wear anything they want are also wrong. Especially in trying to get those that believe women should wear only dresses to wear pants.

Oh and on a final note, I must believe that if a passage of scripture has room for doubt in any ones mind as to what it means then we should not be trying to force one meaning over other as bible doctrine.