More on Skirts

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Leviticus 6:10 (KJV)
10 And the priest shall put on his linen garment, and his linen breeches shall he put upon his flesh, and take up the ashes which the fire hath consumed with the burnt offering on the altar, and he shall put them beside the altar.

The breeches mentioned here is translated from the Hebrew, miknac. It means "to be stored up into hiding". These were indeed bifurcated and worn strictly by the priests.

[Aquila]

So far EB... you've only proven that the Bible illustrates that the priests wore bifurcated clothing. Beyond this, men and women's clothing were rather similar in design. However, some differences were seen with regards to length, fabric, and color. However, women did wear veils. (see attached image).

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

So far EB... you've only proven that the Bible illustrates that the priests wore bifurcated clothing. Beyond this, men and women's clothing were rather similar in design. However, some differences were seen with regards to length, fabric, and color. However, women did wear veils. (see attached image).

Nice picture, headcoverings? Is that what they really looked like? The picture you posted was from about the 1940s to the 50s? More like Arabs, bedouins? Bro, studying history, archeology, all the ancient mechanics on how they actually got things done is left up to detective work. Showing me a picture from a Bible dictionary doesn't actually help. Did they wear headcoverings? Yes, indeed they did. Both Romans as well as the Roman Judeans wore them. What they actually looked like? That takes a little more research, more than a dictionary picture of what an artist had to work with at the time.

What is the picture I posted?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Leviticus 6:10 (KJV)
10 And the priest shall put on his linen garment, and his linen breeches shall he put upon his flesh, and take up the ashes which the fire hath consumed with the burnt offering on the altar, and he shall put them beside the altar.

The breeches mentioned here is translated from the Hebrew, miknac. It means "to be stored up into hiding". These were indeed bifurcated and worn strictly by the priests.

Now look up פטיש it is a masculine noun. Actually means coat which incorporates legging trousers.

Daniel 3:21 et confestim viri illi vincti cum bracis suis et tiaris et calciamentis et vestibus missi sunt in medium fornacis ignis ardentis

τότε οἱ ἄνδρες ἐκεῖνοι ἐπεδήθησαν σὺν τοῖς σαραβάροις αὐτῶν καὶ τιάραις καὶ περικνημίσι καὶ ἐβλήθησαν εἰς τὸ μέσον τῆς καμίνου τοῦ πυρὸς τῆς καιομένης,

In Latin, Greek, and Aramaic it means trousers, leggings, pants, which were incorporated into the outer coat.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Aquila

So far EB... you've only proven that the Bible illustrates that the priests wore bifurcated clothing. Beyond this, men and women's clothing were rather similar in design. However, some differences were seen with regards to length, fabric, and color. However, women did wear veils. (see attached image).

Nice pic!

My favorite is this one of Jesus. I'm not ashamed to post this to my FB wall...are you?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Now look up פטיש it is a masculine noun. Actually means coat which incorporates legging trousers.

Daniel 3:21 et confestim viri illi vincti cum bracis suis et tiaris et calciamentis et vestibus missi sunt in medium fornacis ignis ardentis

τότε οἱ ἄνδρες ἐκεῖνοι ἐπεδήθησαν σὺν τοῖς σαραβάροις αὐτῶν καὶ τιάραις καὶ περικνημίσι καὶ ἐβλήθησαν εἰς τὸ μέσον τῆς καμίνου τοῦ πυρὸς τῆς καιομένης,

In Latin, Greek, and Aramaic it means trousers, leggings, pants, which were incorporated into the outer coat.

I know the passage in Leviticus means pants or trousers. That's why I said that they were bifurcated. However, this is describing an article of the priest's clothing, not the garments of a commoner.

Your other example was,

Daniel 3:21 King James Version (KJV)
21 Then these men were bound in their coats, their hosen, and their hats, and their other garments, and were cast into the midst of the burning fiery furnace.

The "hosen" were not pants or trousers. The hosen was the paṭṭîysh, which was the kuttoneth (worn by both men and women). It was the under tunic worn in ancient times. It wasn't bifurcated. In fact, it translates, "as if hammered out wide", so it was open at the bottom. It is also translated, using the English words "garment, coat, tunic". These weren't pants.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Now look up פטיש it is a masculine noun. Actually means coat which incorporates legging trousers.

Daniel 3:21 et confestim viri illi vincti cum bracis suis et tiaris et calciamentis et vestibus missi sunt in medium fornacis ignis ardentis

τότε οἱ ἄνδρες ἐκεῖνοι ἐπεδήθησαν σὺν τοῖς σαραβάροις αὐτῶν καὶ τιάραις καὶ περικνημίσι καὶ ἐβλήθησαν εἰς τὸ μέσον τῆς καμίνου τοῦ πυρὸς τῆς καιομένης,

In Latin, Greek, and Aramaic it means trousers, leggings, pants, which were incorporated into the outer coat.

The "hosen" was the inner tunic, the kuttoneth.

[Amanah]

Originally Posted by Sister Alvear

Dishonesty (Proverbs 12:22).
Arrogant pride (Proverbs 16:5).
Ignoring God’s law (Proverbs 28:9).
Devising evil and sowing discord (Proverbs 6:16-19).
Eating what the Bible calls “unclean” animals (Leviticus 11:8; Leviticus 11:11; Leviticus 11:13; Leviticus 11:23).
The act of homosexuality (Leviticus 18:22).

I'm confused, would you please include commentary?

[Sister Alvear]

Originally Posted by Amanah

I'm confused, would you please include commentary?

Just posting other things that the Bible calls an abomination...

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

I know the passage in Leviticus means pants or trousers. That's why I said that they were bifurcated. However, this is describing an article of the priest's clothing, not the garments of a commoner.

Your other example was,

Daniel 3:21 King James Version (KJV)
21 Then these men were bound in their coats, their hosen, and their hats, and their other garments, and were cast into the midst of the burning fiery furnace.

The "hosen" were not pants or trousers. The hosen was the paṭṭîysh, which was the kuttoneth (worn by both men and women). It was the under tunic worn in ancient times. It wasn't bifurcated. In fact, it translates, "as if hammered out wide", so it was open at the bottom. It is also translated,

using the English words

"garment, coat, tunic". These weren't pants.

I only gave you English words?

You want to try that again?