Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliny
An ignorant argument.
There is a reason why "we do not see any mention of women wearing pants". Because they didn't!
|
You can't find a Scriptural example of men wearing pants, outside of the three Hebrew captives wherein men wore Babylonian hosen.
Quote:
|
Thus, even if I provided a historical statement that said godly women never wore pants, you would still complain because you refuse to accept the answer. No amount of evidence will suffice. Instead you hide behind contrived logical fallacies hoping no one will notice.
|
Blah, blah, blah. Guess what, I'm currently looking into if women wore breeches or any bifurcated garments under their tunics in the Winter months or to protect from the elements in ancient times. While we might not see a reference to women wearing breeches in Scripture, we might find that women wearing breeches (or even hosen) under their tunics was a common practice when the weather was bad. I'm looking into it. I'll get back with you if I find anything significant.
Quote:
|
It is understood that godly women did not wear pants. Prove otherwise - the real argument from silence. Your trying to prove something without any evidence.
|
You sound like you're stomping your feet and demanding, demanding, demanding.
Bro, it's an argument from silence. That means... we truly don't know. That's the HONEST answer. To find out, we have to study the culture and what archeologists have discovered thus far.
Quote:
|
As to your other ludicrous statement, science would give us the answer.
|
Bingo. Science, science such as archeology, might shed some light on the issue. Don't get your breeches all up in a bunch. LOL