Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
Speaking of pure eisegesis, you're committing the same offense of which you accuse Aquila.
|
Thank you for demonstrating you have no idea what you are talking about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
"The Jews." There is no mention of male or female. "The Jews." You are reading into something which isn't there, when you claim Barnes is only speaking of Jewish males.
|
So you believe there were women priests? Barnes noted the Levites which is a clear reference to the command for the priests to wear breeches. So, the only logical conclusion is you believe there were women priests. That is called eisegesis. You and Aquila - two proverbial peas in a pod.
Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
False. There is no passage stating women only wore robes. You are reading into something which isn't there. You read about Priests wearing underwear and 3 Jewish guys wearing hose and thought it supports your personal opinion that only men wore bifurcated garments.
|
You must believe pedophilia is okay. If not please show where it is specifically condemned.
The truth is, the Bible demonstrates that only godly men wore pants. Godly women did not. Please demonstrate, specifically, where women wore pants.