Trinitarian Commentaries vs. Discourse Analysis (E

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Steven Avery

Did your research determine that the Westcott-Hort recension, the Critical Text, is superior and authentic compared to the Reformation Bible text? That the 45 verses, including the Mark Ending, the Pericope Adulterae, Acts 8:37, “father, forgive them”, the heavenly winesses, were dastardly interpolations rather than authenic scripture?

Steven

*Again, I am well familiar w. your position. But, your info. is outdated (as demonstrated by your appeal to WH above) & agenda-driven (as demonstrated by your charge of "dastardly interpolations" above). Variants are individually weighed not counted (Argumentum Ad Populum fallacy). I would advise you to interact w. Munster, the world-hub of text-criticism proper (http://egora.uni-muenster.de/intf/index_en.shtml).

There is presently a massive collation being conducted in Munster from all Greek MSS for variants, etc. based upon the Coherence Based Genealogical Method:

https://www.uni-muenster.de/INTF/Gen...al_method.html

https://reformedforum.org/ctc476/

*Some evidences support Byzantine-Western readings - others Alexandrian renderings. This is where the very hard work of unbiased text-critical work enters the scenario. It's simply labeled as scholastic integrity & humility.

*Teaching on textual variants tomorrow night. Busy next few days .