Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen
You are going to all these extremes trying to justify this reasoning. But I said "As long as the man made law doesn't contradict the law of God scripture shows you are bound to it, it even says you bring judgement on yourself for breaking it." Per Romans 13:1-2 point blank! So that debunks all the things you just threw out. The Kind Davis thing, the 3 Hebrew, boys, and the Berlin Wall.
Anything that's against the law of God doesn't matter what man says. In those cases it doesn't matter what man says. But what you are talking about doesn't fall under that. In that case rebellion would be as the sin of witchcraft as you said. |
Im not the only person that argues your use of this scripture in the manner you used it.
http://www.gotquestions.org/American...Romans-13.html
Like the Pharasees ultra-cons, and like Publicans the left, add laws to the books to satisfy their OWN version of right and wrong. If a law contradicted any of the 10 commandments, it is not to be obeyed and one would be in keeping with many bible heros to stand up to it. I think we agree there.
However, suppose a UPCI member pastor is president. He orders all to be in complience with the doctrines of holiness standards, and declares the only legal religion to be in line with the UPCI. Great for us, A devout Catholic may rise up in rebellion for the same excuse you give and would be justified by his religious view.
This is why I prefer that gooberment be kept far from religions and religions far from gooberment.
Threaded Mode
