Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
You need to read and digest your own writing. Matthew 28:19 is spurious but the rest of the document has not been tampered with? How do you know? You already accused the document of a falsehood. Why CAN’T there be others. Hebrew to Greek? Explain how there are verses that make no sense in Hebrew. By saying that one portion of Matthew is inaccurate it is then not authentic. To say it is a translation of a LOST translation brings also even more problems which you refuse to deal with. |
If other parts of Matthew have been tampered with, I have no idea, nor does it concerns me at this point. If others raise some issues with other texts, I will leave that for them to demonstrate their evidence for such beliefs.
However this particular text does interest me, because there is plenty of evidence that it was tampered with in the translation from Hebrew into Greek.
Threaded Mode
