Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
Therein lies the rub. FZ, this is the problem, and obstacle for us. You told us in another thread (the new one you started) that some things you didn't really know. Therefore you should go back to the woodshed and stay there until you take your show on the road. You compared us with Trinitarians. We aren't blind Trinitarians unwilling to learn, therefore as Trinitarians lashing out at what they believe to be heresy. I already gave you my view on all of this in this very thread. If the traditional, original Greek Matthew 28:19 is spurious, then what else is botched up? It is that simple. If we have a Greek forgery with one error, then logically there should be at least two or three others? Wouldn't you agree? The people you have quoted not only believe Matthew 29:19 to be bogus but whole books in the New Testament. Where does it end? Agostic, and Atheist like Bart Ehrman. |
ah the slippery slope argument, pretty good.
you paid attention in the debate class.
Threaded Mode
