The thread had 1289 replies and over 10,000 views one of the largest I assume? I also noticed I was the ONLY veiwer there. On the first two pages the rest had less than a 100 replies. Does make you wonder.
I do not have a problem moving it back here. We are creatures of habit and coming to FH to find things is what most do.
There has been some effort to try to get traffic in other areas of the forum. It seems it just doesn't work.
I will bring it over for you and take my lashings in the admin area.
Why would you get lashings for reposting though a controversal but a heavily read and replied thread? If folks don't post on the thread it will die on it's own. I had never been to the deep waters section before like most I just look here. If it was a viewed section I would have no problem. I remember on FCF I used to go to the prophecy section and read Elder Blume-Chalfant-Parson's debates they were great. I never posted much but read a quite a bit. But it was a visited section.
Why would you get lashings for reposting though a controversal but a heavily read and replied thread? If folks don't post on the thread it will die on it's own. I had never been to the deep waters section before like most I just look here. If it was a viewed section I would have no problem. I remember on FCF I used to go to the prophecy section and read Elder Blume-Chalfant-Parson's debates they were great. I never posted much but read a quite a bit. But it was a visited section.
I understand and I'm on your side here........
__________________
Master of Science in Applied Disgruntled Religious Theorist Wrangling
PhD in Petulant Tantrum Quelling
Dean of the School of Hard Knocks
If there was a way to create interest in other sections I would be all for it I think it would be good. Maybe a prophecy section if someone knowlegable like Parsons or Elder Chalfant would discuss with Elder Blume??? I do not know how to involve them it was very interesting.
Linear Mode
