Chuck Grassley,"Pence Won't be There"

[Originalist]

Wild rumors coming from Chuck Grassley's office.

Steve Bannon read a quote from Grassley saying that President Pro Tem of the Senate, he would be presiding over the proceedings tomorrow as Pence is not expected to be there, or might show up and then have to leave!! No joke!
Wow!!

https://news.yahoo.com/gop-sen-chuck...162212064.html

[Esaias]

Steve Bannon from the CFR?

[Pressing-On]

Roll Call

Grassley's office clarifies that he was meaning to explain what would happen if Pence had to step away during Wednesday's proceedings to count Electoral College votes. "Every indication we have is that the vice president will be there," Grassley's office said.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Wild rumors coming from Chuck Grassley's office.

Steve Bannon read a quote from Grassley saying that President Pro Tem of the Senate, he would be presiding over the proceedings tomorrow as Pence is not expected to be there, or might show up and then have to leave!! No joke!
Wow!!

https://news.yahoo.com/gop-sen-chuck...162212064.html

There were wild rumors from Qidiots on Twitter last week that Pence was dead and some body double was being used.

I've been waiting for the news that Pence has to quarantine due to potential exposure. (Someone related to a friend of a VP Staffer was having symptoms so the VP, out of the abundance of caution, must quarantine himself) Not really...

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

There were wild rumors from Qidiots on Twitter last week that Pence was dead and some body double was being used.

I've been waiting for the news that Pence has to quarantine due to potential exposure. (Someone related to a friend of a VP Staffer was having symptoms so the VP, out of the abundance of caution, must quarantine himself) Not really...

I do think Pence is not happy with the situation history is placing him in.

[TJJJ]

Heh heh heh, looks like a wild ride for the next few days.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by TJJJ

Heh heh heh, looks like a wild ride for the next few days.

So far I am only seeing arguments that have already been made and ignored. All the arguments are sound constitutionally. But since when is the Constitution adhered to?

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Originalist

So far I am only seeing arguments that have already been made and ignored. All the arguments are sound constitutionally. But since when is the Constitution adhered to?

Keep making these observations and you will find yourself understanding what I've been trying to tell you, bro.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Keep making these observations and you will find yourself understanding what I've been trying to tell you, bro.

I have never doubted you. We just have different views on how to resolve it.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Originalist

I have never doubted you. We just have different views on how to resolve it.

Fair enough.