Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
I can't wait. But I doubt she has any? Thus far she's gotten away with making claims of some future release of evidence. She won't be able to talk her way past the Judge. And if she's just talking big, lying, and has no evidence, I hope the Judge rules in the company's favor.
For years, we've railed against fake news and those who have lied against Trump and conservatives. We've demanded accountability in social media and the media in general for their lies.
This goes both ways. Sidney, Lin Wood, and Rudy have been the main ones stirring up Trump supporters and making the claims that the election was stolen from Trump. They're 0-60 something in court, even those with Trump appointed Judges.
|
If you had actually followed the information instead of acting like a fish wife, you may be aware that no court would look at the evidence. Their claim has always been having no standing and never thrown out on the merits, i.e., evidence. She still has Supreme Courts cases that are on the docket which haven’t been heard.
If you had watched the Georgia Senate Hearing, you would have seen Jovan Hutton Pulitzer testify twice. The second time, he came up to the podium to show that the Georgia Senate runoff poll pads were hooked up to the Internet. To say no fraud had taken place with the Dominion machines is false. It is a crime. And it is a shame that nothing is being done.
Threaded Mode
