Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2007, 09:39 AM
Kutless Kutless is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,651
Trinitarian just told me........

God exists as a diferientiated infinite unity that is triune - 3 in 1, but not triplex - 3 in parts

The Athanasian Creed explicitly rejects tritheism.


....he then goes on to say....

the true teaching of the trinity is a oneness doctrine.
__________________
He Forgives and Forgets

have your pets spayed or neutered
Bob Barker
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2007, 10:33 AM
Chan
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kutless View Post
God exists as a diferientiated infinite unity that is triune - 3 in 1, but not triplex - 3 in parts
That trinitarian seems confused and "differentiated infinite unity that is triune" is really vague. How is the unity differentiated? Isn't differentiating the unity dividing it into parts?

Quote:
The Athanasian Creed explicitly rejects tritheism.
Does it? Consider this portion of that Creed: "For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity to acknowledge every Person by himself to be God and Lord; So are we forbidden by the catholic religion to say; There are three Gods or three Lords."

Quote:
....he then goes on to say....

the true teaching of the trinity is a oneness doctrine.
Not if he's basing it on the Athanasian Creed. It's true that there is not a great degree of difference between some versions of modern oneness doctrine and the trinity doctrine of the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed but there is no way one can rightly claim that modern versions of the trinity doctrine are oneness. Maybe the guy meant that the trinity doctrine is a monotheistic (one God) doctrine, which would be a true statement at least with regard to the trinity doctrine of the Nicene-Constantinople Creed and the beliefs of the Nicene and Ante-Nicene fathers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-20-2007, 11:04 AM
sola gratia's Avatar
sola gratia sola gratia is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 411
Do you really think the Anthanasian Creed is that far from the original thoughts?

I think you have to take the creed in context - making it relevant to the time frame of which it was written.....

I dont have a huge issue with the Anthanasian Creed
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-20-2007, 12:23 PM
Chan
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by sola gratia View Post
Do you really think the Anthanasian Creed is that far from the original thoughts?
Yes, particularly since Athanasius had nothing to do with writing it!

Quote:
I think you have to take the creed in context - making it relevant to the time frame of which it was written.....
The Athanasian Creed is a sixth century document. Here's an English translation of it:

1. Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith;

2. Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.
3. And the catholic faith is this: That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity;
4. Neither confounding the persons nor dividing the substance.
5. For there is one person* of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Spirit.
6. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is all one, the glory equal, the majesty coeternal.
7. Such as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Spirit.
8. The Father uncreated, the Son uncreated, and the Holy Spirit uncreated.
9. The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, and the Holy Spirit incomprehensible.
10. The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Spirit eternal.
11. And yet they are not three eternals but one eternal.
12. As also there are not three uncreated nor three incomprehensible, but one uncreated and one incomprehensible.
13. So likewise the Father is almighty, the Son almighty, and the Holy Spirit almighty.
14. And yet they are not three almighties, but one almighty.
15. So the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God;
16. And yet they are not three Gods, but one God.
17. So likewise the Father is Lord, the Son Lord, and the Holy Spirit Lord;
18. And yet they are not three Lords but one Lord.
19. For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity to acknowledge every Person by himself to be God and Lord;
20. So are we forbidden by the catholic religion to say; There are three Gods or three Lords.
21. The Father is made of none, neither created nor begotten.
22. The Son is of the Father alone; not made nor created, but begotten.
23. The Holy Spirit is of the Father and of the Son; neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding.
24. So there is one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three Sons; one Holy Spirit, not three Holy Spirits.
25. And in this Trinity none is afore or after another; none is greater or less than another.
26. But the whole three persons are coeternal, and coequal.
27. So that in all things, as aforesaid, the Unity in Trinity and the Trinity in Unity is to be worshipped.
28. He therefore that will be saved must thus think of the Trinity.
29. Furthermore it is necessary to everlasting salvation that he also believe rightly the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ.
30. For the right faith is that we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and man.
31. God of the substance of the Father, begotten before the worlds; and man of substance of His mother, born in the world.
32. Perfect God and perfect man, of a reasonable soul and human flesh subsisting.
33. Equal to the Father as touching His Godhead, and inferior to the Father as touching His manhood.
34. Who, although He is God and man, yet He is not two, but one Christ.
35. One, not by conversion of the Godhead into flesh, but by taking of that manhood into God.
36. One altogether, not by confusion of substance, but by unity of person.
37. For as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man, so God and man is one Christ;
38. Who suffered for our salvation, descended into hell, rose again the third day from the dead;
39. He ascended into heaven, He sits on the right hand of the Father, God, Almighty;
40. From thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
41. At whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies;
42. and shall give account of their own works.
43. And they that have done good shall go into life everlasting and they that have done evil into everlasting fire. 44. This is the catholic faith, which except a man believe faithfully he cannot be saved.

*The Latin word here is "persona," of which "person" is an inappropriate English translation since the Latin word "persona" has an identical equivalent (the English word "persona").


Quote:
I dont have a huge issue with the Anthanasian Creed
I reject every development in the trinity doctrine after the Council of Ephesus' prohibition against any further changes to the Nicene Creed (the most recent version at the time having been the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed of 381 A.D.) - though I agree with Nestorius that those things pertaining to Jesus' divinity do not pertain to His humanity and those things pertaining to His humanity do not pertain to His divinity. I also accept the Confession of the Synod at Mar Aqaq (486 A.D.) except that I would delete the phrase "the copies of": "But our faith in the dispensation of Christ should also be in a confession of two natures of Godhead and manhood, none of us venturing to introduce mixture, commingling, or confusion into the distinctions of those two natures. Instead, while Godhead remains and is preserved in that which belongs to it, and manhood in that which belongs to it, we combine the copies of their natures in one Lordship and one worship because of the perfect and inseparable conjunction which the Godhead had with the manhood. If anyone thinks or teaches others that suffering and change adhere to the Godhead of our Lord, not preserving - in regard to the union of the parsopa of our Savior - the confession of perfect God and perfect man, the same shall be anathema."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-20-2007, 05:07 PM
CupCake
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kutless View Post
God exists as a diferientiated infinite unity that is triune - 3 in 1, but not triplex - 3 in parts

The Athanasian Creed explicitly rejects tritheism.


....he then goes on to say....

the true teaching of the trinity is a oneness doctrine.

Kutless~ I've not meant one trinity person who believed in more then one God, (Jesus), infact the first time I brought it up they looked at me like I was insane and asked who taught me such nonsense as this. Nope this is just one of many teachings that we've all been taught that is false!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-20-2007, 06:15 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
If his "true trinity teaching" proposes Jesus is not the Father, and that He and the Father and Spirit existed before time began, eternally, then it cannot be oneness doctrine.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-20-2007, 06:18 PM
Scott Hutchinson's Avatar
Scott Hutchinson Scott Hutchinson is offline
Resident PeaceMaker


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jackson,AL.
Posts: 16,548
One can't hold to the eternal sonship doctrine and have true Christian Montheism.
__________________
People who are always looking for fault,can find it easily all they have to do,is look into their mirror.
There they can find plenty of fault.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-20-2007, 09:33 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
If his "true trinity teaching" proposes Jesus is not the Father, and that He and the Father and Spirit existed before time began, eternally, then it cannot be oneness doctrine.
Do NOT confuse them with the facts.

Old Paths posted the AG, GoG, and others articles of faith and all of them defined the Trinity as three separate and distinct persons or beings.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-21-2007, 07:54 AM
sola gratia's Avatar
sola gratia sola gratia is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
Do NOT confuse them with the facts.

Old Paths posted the AG, GoG, and others articles of faith and all of them defined the Trinity as three separate and distinct persons or beings.
so what? What is theologically wrong with that Epley....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-21-2007, 07:58 AM
Kutless Kutless is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by sola gratia View Post
so what? What is theologically wrong with that Epley....
the problem that I can see is his overall attitude. I really hope he doesn't treat his saints in this fashion
__________________
He Forgives and Forgets

have your pets spayed or neutered
Bob Barker
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oneness and Trinitarian Unity? RunningOnFaith Deep Waters 178 11-01-2016 10:35 PM
The Trinitarian Appreciation Thread - We Thank You. SDG The D.A.'s Office 472 02-11-2011 05:43 PM
Things You Want Your Pastor to Know, but You Have Never Told Him... "GL" Fellowship Hall 4 06-09-2007 12:06 PM
Canonball! Trinitarian baptisms are way more fun! SDG The D.A.'s Office 12 06-05-2007 01:46 PM
Has anyone heard of Bob Shafer?? I was told he is Ex-UPC COOPER Fellowship Hall 14 05-03-2007 05:15 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.