Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
When it turned out that Richard Armitage was the "leaker" (and not someone within the Whitehouse) the prosecuter said he was not going to file charges against Armitage because it turns out that "leaking" Plame's name wasn't a crime after all.
So my question, "How could Libby have 'obstructed a criminal investigation' if the subject of the investigation was not a crime?"
It's all just a failed coup attempt by Clinton appointees within the CIA and State Department who should have been replaced by the President in January 2001.
|
Well, he was convicted of lying to authorities and obstruction. That just means he got in the way of the investigation.
Threaded Mode
