In a previous post, a poster has claimed that at the time of the merger both the PCI and PAJC had similar views on the New Birth ...and that many have strayed from this commonly held belief.
I know the vary views on
Acts 2:38 have been discussed ad nauseum ... but clearly there seems to be a distinction between how both view the meaning of being born again as taught by Jesus in
John 3.
Here are some questions I have:
1. What is your interpretation of
John 3?
2. What does being born again really mean?
3. What was the New Birth view of early PCIers and PAJCers?
4. How did early Oneness pioneers interpret
John 3 pre the merger?
5. When Jesus speaks of the Kingdom of God ... is he speaking of the present, future, both? Must a distinction be made between the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Heaven?
6. If we interpret it differently are we part of the same Apostolic movement?
Threaded Mode
