|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
07-20-2007, 02:52 PM
|
 |
www.capitalcommunity.ca
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,300
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by revrandy
How many "Official" sources can there be???  .... |
*keeping quite*
|
07-20-2007, 03:01 PM
|
 |
His Eminance, High Potatohead Potatotate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stockton, California
Posts: 5,376
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeyman
*keeping quite*
|
did you mean..."quiet?"... or is that what they say in Ol. Canuck?
|
07-20-2007, 03:58 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,243
|
|
Hmmmm . . .
Sounds like there are people with "sources" all over the place . . . and I've noticed that whichever the personal preference of the individual is, that's how the vote is going. 
You have anti-ad people saying their sources are stating the vote is overwhelmingly against ads; then
You have pro-ad people saying their sources are stating the vote is overwhelmingly for the ads.
If it wasn't so stupid that this was even an issue with the UPC instead of saving the lost, I'd be laughing. But it's really sad that so much dumb time has been wasted over the issue.
|
07-20-2007, 04:01 PM
|
 |
Smiles everyone...Smiles!!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sparta, TN
Posts: 2,399
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaotic_resolve
Hmmmm . . .
Sounds like there are people with "sources" all over the place . . . and I've noticed that whichever the personal preference of the individual is, that's how the vote is going.
You have anti-ad people saying their sources are stating the vote is overwhelmingly against ads; then
You have pro-ad people saying their sources are stating the vote is overwhelmingly for the ads.
If it wasn't so stupid that this was even an issue with the UPC instead of saving the lost, I'd be laughing. But it's really sad that so much dumb time has been wasted over the issue. |
I agree,
Folks need to stop all this "getting on tv" and get out there and win the lost one soul at a time.
|
07-20-2007, 04:08 PM
|
 |
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaotic_resolve
If it wasn't so stupid that this was even an issue with the UPC instead of saving the lost, I'd be laughing. But it's really sad that so much dumb time has been wasted over the issue.
|
Sad indeed that it seems to be a bigger issue than simply Ads.
If Resolution #4 IS enacted, there are plenty of us who will not change a thing and will not be headed to Sam's Club or Wally World for $999 big screens to "preview ads" either!
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
|
07-20-2007, 04:12 PM
|
 |
Thank you, Thank you very much
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 52
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by COOPER
Closer.....Ain't that hypocritical to use a TV star as your avatar and be against TV? 
|
Mr. Cooper, if you will go back and read my post I do not believe that I ever stated which side of the issue that I was on, only that NLYP had bad information, again.
|
07-20-2007, 04:22 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4
|
|
|
Well from the cheap seats here it appears to me that this thread can be summed up like this - the source that was referred to wasn't quite the source the other source was. But that would really depend on if the source the source knew was really a genuine source. But the other source says that the source isn't a source making the fake source's source not quite the source the source was supposed to be.
That would depend on how reliable the source of the true source's source after all. I bet the source is in trouble if the real source is leaking information from an unreliable source or the unrealiable source of a reliable source.
I bet Hazelwood frowns on sources that become a source instead of something with more integrity. That is dependent on, however, if the source is really a source and not just one said to be a source when the real source is a source quick to say "I heard blah, blah, blah." That again, would depend on the source's true source.
Where did all this information come from? The source of course.
|
07-20-2007, 04:24 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,243
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dean
Well from the cheap seats here it appears to me that this thread can be summed up like this - the source that was referred to wasn't quite the source the other source was. But that would really depend on if the source the source knew was really a genuine source. But the other source says that the source isn't a source making the fake source's source not quite the source the source was supposed to be.
That would depend on how reliable the source of the true source's source after all. I bet the source is in trouble if the real source is leaking information from an unreliable source or the unrealiable source of a reliable source.
I bet Hazelwood frowns on sources that become a source instead of something with more integrity. That is dependent on, however, if the source is really a source and not just one said to be a source when the real source is a source quick to say "I heard blah, blah, blah." That again, would depend on the source's true source.
Where did all this information come from? The source of course.
|
|
07-20-2007, 04:24 PM
|
 |
Hello AFF!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amarillo, Tx.
Posts: 3,611
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Closer
Mr. Cooper, if you will go back and read my post I do not believe that I ever stated which side of the issue that I was on, only that NLYP had bad information, again.
|
State then.....Please!
|
07-20-2007, 04:25 PM
|
|
Hello AFF!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amarillo, Tx.
Posts: 3,611
|
|
|
sour-ce?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:09 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
