|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
07-20-2007, 04:26 PM
|
 |
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dean
Well from the cheap seats here it appears to me that this thread can be summed up like this - the source that was referred to wasn't quite the source the other source was. But that would really depend on if the source the source knew was really a genuine source. But the other source says that the source isn't a source making the fake source's source not quite the source the source was supposed to be.
That would depend on how reliable the source of the true source's source after all. I bet the source is in trouble if the real source is leaking information from an unreliable source or the unrealiable source of a reliable source.
I bet Hazelwood frowns on sources that become a source instead of something with more integrity. That is dependent on, however, if the source is really a source and not just one said to be a source when the real source is a source quick to say "I heard blah, blah, blah." That again, would depend on the source's true source.
Where did all this information come from? The source of course.
|
You have taken Out-sourcing to a whole new level!
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
|
07-20-2007, 04:30 PM
|
|
God is good...yes He's good
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 112
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLYP
Normally I get on here and say things to keep the pot stirred and have some fun on here. Many of you take me seriously. Those of you that know me just sit back, shake your heads and laugh.
Before I give this "NEWSFLASH", let me say this is NOT to stir the pot, this is to be informational. Now it will stir up some...But it will also relieve others...so here goes.
Just received a phone call.....dont ask, dont pm me and dont call me, I WILL NOT TELL!
Lets just say "A VERY reliable source". Trust me on this yea verily...."RELIABLE".
From what he says, according to the mail in cards...85% are in favor TV.
Those that are against have indicated that they will be leaving if it passes.
He also said that it has come from the office of the California DS that a "Large Pocket" of California Conservatives, that have always gone to vote, have said they will not be going to vote and allow the issue to pass and then they will be pulling out of the Org.
So there you have it.....Also, the results will be sent out to the ministers BEFORE General Conference.
|
This is first class PROPAGANDA. 
__________________
He that dwelleth in the "secret place" of the most high shall abide under the shadow of the almighty.
|
07-20-2007, 04:40 PM
|
|
Shaking the dust off my shoes.
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nunya bidness
Posts: 9,004
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dean
Well from the cheap seats here it appears to me that this thread can be summed up like this - the source that was referred to wasn't quite the source the other source was. But that would really depend on if the source the source knew was really a genuine source. But the other source says that the source isn't a source making the fake source's source not quite the source the source was supposed to be.
That would depend on how reliable the source of the true source's source after all. I bet the source is in trouble if the real source is leaking information from an unreliable source or the unrealiable source of a reliable source.
I bet Hazelwood frowns on sources that become a source instead of something with more integrity. That is dependent on, however, if the source is really a source and not just one said to be a source when the real source is a source quick to say "I heard blah, blah, blah." That again, would depend on the source's true source.
Where did all this information come from? The source of course.
|
The source is the source of course of course!
|
07-20-2007, 04:49 PM
|
|
without exception
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Highway of Holiness
Posts: 198
|
|
"This is first class PROPAGANDA."
yea, verily. Not even Louisiana is 85% pro-TV advertizing. Maybe Ohio and Tennessee (Yup, they're loose as a (blue)goose). Nationwide 85%? NLYP was having pudding dreams when he drempt this up.
Seriously, the vote counting is being done by an independent accounting firm. When the final figures truly come out, everyone will know. The numbers are to be published in the Sept. Forward.
When the final figures are released, we'll then know just how credible NLYP and his cohorts are. 
Heading for Tampa in a
Straightline
|
07-20-2007, 05:58 PM
|
|
Superheros are evil...
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 785
|
|
|
__________________
For you, brethren, have been called to liberty; only do not use liberty as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this: "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." But if you bite and devour one another, beware lest you be consumed by one another! (Gal 5:13-15/ NKJV)
|
07-20-2007, 06:11 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,792
|
|
A source is a source, of course, of course,
And no one can talk to a source of course
That is, of course, unless the source is the famous Mister NLYP.
Go right to the source and ask the source
He’ll give you the answer that you’ll endorse.
He’s always on a steady course.
Talk to Mister NLYP.
People yakkity yak a streak and waste your time of day
But Mr. NLYP will never speak unless he has something to say
A source is a source, of course, of course,
And this one’ll talk ‘til his voice is hoarse.
You never heard of a talking source?
Well listen to this: "I'm Mister NLYP."
|
07-20-2007, 06:14 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
|
|
Tell you what my friend....Ill drop it....The Forward will come out and we will read EXACTLY what the results are...then either I will apologize for open bad information or you will apologize for challenging my "past and IQ" in a public setting.
I would like to think you DO know me well enough that I am man enough to take rebuke and a spanking when needed.
|
07-20-2007, 06:15 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrford
A source is a source, of course, of course,
And no one can talk to a source of course
That is, of course, unless the source is the famous Mister NLYP.
Go right to the source and ask the source
He’ll give you the answer that you’ll endorse.
He’s always on a steady course.
Talk to Mister NLYP.
People yakkity yak a streak and waste your time of day
But Mr. NLYP will never speak unless he has something to say
A source is a source, of course, of course,
And this one’ll talk ‘til his voice is hoarse.
You never heard of a talking source?
Well listen to this: "I'm Mister NLYP."
|
OK I admit it...that was funny. :sshhh
|
07-20-2007, 06:15 PM
|
|
Shaking the dust off my shoes.
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nunya bidness
Posts: 9,004
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrford
A source is a source, of course, of course,
And no one can talk to a source of course
That is, of course, unless the source is the famous Mister NLYP.
Go right to the source and ask the source
He’ll give you the answer that you’ll endorse.
He’s always on a steady course.
Talk to Mister NLYP.
People yakkity yak a streak and waste your time of day
But Mr. NLYP will never speak unless he has something to say
A source is a source, of course, of course,
And this one’ll talk ‘til his voice is hoarse.
You never heard of a talking source?
Well listen to this: "I'm Mister NLYP."
|
 I had hoped someone who knew the whole song would come along and do something like this.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 PM.
| |
Linear Mode
