I know first-hand of men who have marked through the TV line on the AS, signed it, and sent it in....nothing happened. These guys weren't lying...some have even written on there that they had a TV....nothing happened.
I'm just curious what you all think of THESE cases...who's at fault?
There is no fault if the AS was accepted. Handwritten alterations and addendums are acceptable in legal documents.
__________________ "It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
My husband used to write "I believe and teach the Bible". And sent it in that way.
I think the AOF read
Repentance and Conversion:
under what is now just the Repentance heading.
__________________ "It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
What's the point of having an AS then? If we could write in enough things, we could sign it too.
Well not really... There is a 5 page limit on addendums and it would still be limited to people of conscience...
j/k
__________________ "It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
I know first-hand of men who have marked through the TV line on the AS, signed it, and sent it in....nothing happened. These guys weren't lying...some have even written on there that they had a TV....nothing happened.
I'm just curious what you all think of THESE cases...who's at fault?
I know this was addressed to someone else but let me answer it... please?
In cases like this the ones at fault are the weak kneed, spineless excuse for an elected official that lets is go without demanding the accountability that it provides for.
Unfortunately, I know of cases just like this. I know of one case where the DS altered the answer on a ministerial application for a license and lied FOR the applicant!
I know this was addressed to someone else but let me answer it... please?
In cases like this the ones at fault are the weak kneed, spineless excuse for an elected official that lets is go without demanding the accountability that it provides for.
Unfortunately, I know of cases just like this. I know of one case where the DS altered the answer on a ministerial application for a license and lied FOR the applicant!
Or maybe it is a DS who agrees with those that are marking out the line or signing "with reservations" or some other tag line.
instead of weak kneed, maybe it is a DS who just thinks the AS is an infernal document that has done more harm than good...
that is just my opinion. it could be a weak kneed offical looking to keep his position. or maybe it is a guy who really feels that the AS was wrong headed in the first place and agrees with the majority of his district.
could be either Steadfast.
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
Or maybe it is a DS who agrees with those that are marking out the line or signing "with reservations" or some other tag line.
instead of weak kneed, maybe it is a DS who just thinks the AS is an infernal document that has done more harm than good...
that is just my opinion. it could be a weak kneed offical looking to keep his position. or maybe it is a guy who really feels that the AS was wrong headed in the first place and agrees with the majority of his district.
Linear Mode
