Water baptism, can you agree with this statement?

[J-Roc]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

The body of sin ... is a growth that the blood missed at repentance???

Oh boy....a tumor. lol

[J-Roc]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

If you think anyone here is arguing against obedience ... YOU STILL DON'T GET IT as doesn't TBP... and are very disingenuous in stating that I and others on this board are advocating DISOBEDIENCE.

PCIers from Goss on down ... believe that baptism is to be obeyed ... as an initial step ...

but unfortunately until this day friend you haven't captured the dynamics of this debate ...

we are looking at what happens at baptism ... what it signifies

and the when and how of the New Birth....

One day it will click.

It doesn't matter how large your font size is on this.... it won't register.

[Nahum]

Honestly, we're all sick of trying to debate something that we know to be true. Especially when the vitriol is running so deep on this thread. The truth is you blasphemers and purveyors of "anything goes" theology have ears that are plugged to sound doctrine.

Look, I have watched this thread and noticed how casually you have spoken about the blood of Christ. As if it were something to be bargained over? You should be ashamed of yourselves for profaning holy things.

And you wonder why no one wants to dialogue with you?

Hello?

Are you really that stupid?

[J-Roc]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

So did I ... some call it a breach New Birth. ... Resurrection before the death and burial of water baptism.

a breach new birth?? ....this is hilarious.

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Stick around long enough and see a handful lose their HG ... in this thread when they realize there's been a coup d'etat.

Got a camera? oloroid

Is this an attempt at humor?

I am honestly embarrassed for you Daniel.

[J-Roc]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Is this an attempt at humor?

I am honestly embarrassed for you Daniel.

My favorite term is "friend of the bride"....who came up with that?

[J-Roc]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Honestly, we're all sick of trying to debate something that we know to be true. Especially when the vitriol is running so deep on this thread. The truth is you blasphemers and purveyors of "anything goes" theology have ears that are plugged to sound doctrine.

Look, I have watched this thread and noticed how casually you have spoken about the blood of Christ. As if it were something to be bargained over? You should be ashamed of yourselves for profaning holy things.

And you wonder why no one wants to dialogue with you?

Hello?

Are you really that stupid?

Can you site some examples of casually speaking about the blood of Christ? Seriously, I missed this...

[Nahum]

[QUOTE]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

3-Fold application of blood??? We ???? Phil you been around this topic to know that not all of your SACRAMENTALIST BAPTISMAL REGENERATIONIST friends believe the blood is applied at each step ... there is even agreement on when justification or remission happen ...

based on your logic one application isn't enough to wipe our slate clean or to bring us in good standing w/ God.

How many coats will do it?[/

For J-Roc.

[Encryptus]

[QUOTE=Pastor Poster;261315]

For J-Roc.

Dude really stretching to find sacrilegious there

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman

Just because DA concurs with it doesn't mean he's correct in his understanding. It blows me away, that at one time, he believed it to be salvational to be baptized in Jesus name.

Yes, it is sad that he left sound doctrine.