
10-31-2007, 10:05 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaBishop
The PAW is not going TRINITY! I do agree with THAD that they have lost much of what they had spiritually because they have gone more into ceremony but it is not because they have ministers that are outside thier rhelm of revelation.
You guys forget the facts that Oneness and A/G fellowshipped and preached for each other for years after the split. YOU CANNOT IGNORE HISTORY!
The DS of Florida called the A/G - "separated brethren" when I first went before the FL board to get license. He said - "You were ordained by "separated brethren". I had NO CLUE what he was talking about. I asked him - Brother Crabtree - what do you mean. He said - "we were all ONE at one time - but we had to separate because of the Revelation of Oneness - but we are still brothers"! HE WAS THE DS of FL!
Just because you love people and allow them to minister in your pulpit does not mean you accept all their doctrine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do any of you know ANYBODY that totally agrees with you on every point of Doctrine?
Please stop making this all so personal. I am not attacking anyone. We can't even discuss something without someone thinking that they are being attacked personally!
|
AB, the PAW fell just three votes short of basically saying it was acceptable. While they, themselves, may not 'believe' trinity (and, yes, some DO believe the trinity) they basically said they see no issue accepting false doctrine.
As for 'brethren separated' nonsense? There was always a difference in the sons of promise and the sons of Hagar. If you don't like that point a finger at God as He is the one that declared it to be so.
Trinitarians believe a lie. Now that is really simple. Can one be saved not understanding Oneness? I'm persuaded that if they have obeyed the New Birth according to the Bible... perhaps. But NOBODY can be saved promoting a lie and the TRINITY is a lie.
If the truth about Oneness doens't matter then what else doesn't matter?
|