Quote:
Originally Posted by dizzyde
If that is the case, it might be a good thing, however, are these men really looking for outside reinforcement?
If they wanted checks and balances, well they are leaving a whole organization of people with differing viewpoints. That is one of the great things about being part of a large organization, you have all sides of the issues represented, it is how you balance each other.
I thought that the reason that these men were leaving was that they couldn't "compromise" their beliefs. Why would they be looking for balance at this point?
|
I didn't mean "checks and balances" in regards to the new org.'s firmly held beliefs. I meant someone outside their group to monitor that they handle things ethicaly, correctly, and in a right spirit. Someone who could speak up and say when they felt a wrong spirit was manifesting itself in any decision making. Someone to help insure rancor was kept out. I have no idea if this is the case. I was just trying to figure out some rationale for ultra cons to have a lib at their meeting!
Threaded Mode
