Quote:
Originally Posted by meBNme
I question your claim of "recruiting".
I'm not saying you are wrong, please understand.
I just need clarification.
Are they simply inviting others to meetings? And if so, how is that recruiting?
Just because there is a meeting does not mean they are trying to convince others to leave. They very well may simply be discussing what should be done. Should another org be formed for those who already are considering leaving or should everyone remain and try to overturn the decision?
Until we know what is actually happening in those meetings, it is irresponsible to condemn them. I am seeing a lot of "he said, she said" on here, rumors and speculation. And people are all out attacking others because of the rumors and speculation. That is absolutely insane, and it is not of God.
If there are those who are genuinely trying to persuade others to leave the org while currently holding membership, then yes, that is wrong. But I'm pretty certain that there is far less of that going on that what is being portrayed by all the speculation and rumors.
|
What some fail to realize is that, most likely, the vast majority of those who go to Tulsa will
remain in the UPC and network with the conservative element represented in Tulsa.
The network they are trying to put together does not require or expect one to get out of the UPC. Asking a friend to network with those most aligned with his beliefs is NOT asking someone to leave the UPC.
Threaded Mode
