Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind
I was still dripping wet when I first talked in tongues.
Ok, in another thread you have an excellent piece that water baptism is not what will condemn a person. You stated the lack of obedience would ........ that person. Now you are making me wonder if you are too close to the eggnog....
Do you now say that water baptism is totally not provable since inerrant men translated the Bible? I guess spelling and definations are going to have to be thrown out the window since Noah Webster was never noted for being "in the bride."
Oh, and we still sing the VERSES to page 369 at our church.
|
My point is that we are standing on the shoulders of non-Apostolic giants, men like Tyndale, Wycliffe, Huss, Wesely, etc....and then we judge them as condemned because they didn't have the understanding we have.
I find that problematic. How can we condemn men who if not for them...we wouldn't even have our Bibles?
Threaded Mode
