Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd
Pel, I have said that generally you have been very balanced. your reference here might (without the context of the current atomosphere) have not been seen as crossing that line... .however, you do have to admit that the context is what it is. I believe Scotty's irritiation is with the way some have used the PCI doctrine as a baseball bat. the words "Papist" and "Mormon" and "Baptismal Regenreationilist" (sp) have been tossed about and used in a very unkind and inaccurate manner for the last little while and I think that is the source of Scotty's irritation.
At least he has been here to tell it. others have just checked out.
I personally would like to see them come back. I hope you agree with that.
I do appreciate you and i agree that every side of our history needs to be visible. I have ALWAYS said that the UPCI needs both the PAJC and the PCI view. (And this board does too.)
|
You big ole smarmy compromiser!!!!!  
__________________
Psa 119:165 (KJV) 165 Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them.
"Do not believe everthing you read on the internet" - Abe Lincoln
|