Yes we are aware of Cornelius receiving the Spirit before baptism. It presents us with a challenge in understanding our view of the new birth. But consider that this works both ways.
When I was early in my walk something bothered me. I had repented and I also had received the Holy Spirit with tongues and prophecy following. I was loving Jesus and happy in him.
However every time I would read this verse:
16: He that believeth
and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
Mark 16:16
That sure sounded like one needed to be baptized to be saved. I did not know any Oneness Pentecostals then so this was something between me and the word of God. That scripture sure sounded a lot like THIS:
38: Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Acts 2:38
Baptism for the remission of sins?
Certain scriptures seemed to say my experience was not complete. Until I was baptized it always tugged at my heart when I saw them.
So if one was on the side of the fence I was
THOSE SCRIPTURES seemed out of place somehow. We thought
IF ONE BELIEVED and confessed Christ was risen from the dead (
Romans 10:9) they were saved.
Yet there was scripture seeming to say we were not saved or at best not "fully saved".
So when people bring up Cornelius ok. But just like myself there are people on the other end of this discussion who can see scripture pointing them on to yet more truth.