So in light of classical Pentecostalism and Apostolic apologetics would not Jeremiah Wright’s concerns regarding the evaporation of innocent children in an unprecedented act of war conducted upon the civilian population of Japan be warranted for consideration, just as Samuel-Clibborn Booth’s assessment of patriotic Molechism was warranted during WWI?
Would not the willingness to advocate, “better their children than mine”, as opposed to praying for peace and opposing the sinful circumstances entirely also be of some ethical concern?
Chris, many Holy Ghost filled men on this forum disagree with JW, yet, instead of following what you claim to believe about anointing not dwelling in men who lack truth, you throw that out the window in an attempt to win an argument.
Gut feelings don't replace truth nor anointing, Chris.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
I'm refering to Bro. David K. Bernard and the classical views of classical Oneness Pentecostalism that developed early on in our movements and left an undeniable impact on black churches throughout America.
__________________
"For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for wholeness and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope." Jeremiah 29:11 (English Standard Version)
He speaks out of both sides of his mouth. I don't believe even he knows exactly what he stands for nor what is going on here.
I believe you're missing the point of the underlying issues.
__________________
"For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for wholeness and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope." Jeremiah 29:11 (English Standard Version)
Let's see if you and I are on the same page. What is going on here?
His claims that since certain Holy Ghost filled men say one thing, and non Holy Ghost filled men say another, he'll choose the Holy Ghost filled men because they have anointing, yet JW isn't Holy Ghost filled (according to how Chris believes), but he'll toss aside the words of Holy Ghost filled men on this forum to defend his 'gut feelings', which he takes as anointing, but I think it's just gas bubbles.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
I'm refering to Bro. David K. Bernard and the classical views of classical Oneness Pentecostalism that developed early on in our movements and left an undeniable impact on black churches throughout America.
Chris, I'm just repeating your own words in the matter. You can rearrange them to suit you in whatever situation you please.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
Chris, many Holy Ghost filled men on this forum disagree with JW, yet, instead of following what you claim to believe about anointing not dwelling in men who lack truth, you throw that out the window in an attempt to win an argument.
Gut feelings don't replace truth nor anointing, Chris.
This isn't about winning an argument. It's about defending truth. This isn't something I expect to win.
HeavenlyOne...are you meaning to tell me you'd allow Reformed Presbyteran Dominionists shape or enfluence your world view over an anointed Apostolic man of God such as Bro. David K. Bernard?
__________________
"For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for wholeness and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope." Jeremiah 29:11 (English Standard Version)
His claims that since certain Holy Ghost filled men say one thing, and non Holy Ghost filled men say another, he'll choose the Holy Ghost filled men because they have anointing, yet JW isn't Holy Ghost filled (according to how Chris believes), but he'll toss aside the words of Holy Ghost filled men on this forum to defend his 'gut feelings', which he takes as anointing, but I think it's just gas bubbles.
What I thought was going on here is that CH made some comments directed at RD that are not true. He has since then been trying to prod RD into a debate with him, which CH would promptly lose because he is completely out of his league when it comes to RD. However, being the gentleman that he is, RD has not taken the aforementioned bait. That, plus what you said! LOL!
This isn't about winning an argument. It's about defending truth. This isn't something I expect to win.
HeavenlyOne...are you meaning to tell me you'd allow Reformed Presbyteran Dominionists shape or enfluence your world view over an anointed Apostolic man of God such as Bro. David K. Bernard?
No, but I wouldn't throw out their words because they don't have the Holy Ghost either.
Neither would I necessarily agree with everything DKB has to say.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
I have no issue with anointed knowledge and anointing. However, I caution against unanointed knowledge mixed with professed anointing. Such is lukewarm at best.
It is written,
1 Corinthians 2:4
And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power:
And I believe that I follow men who have that annointing along with knowledge. And you and I disagree. So what settles the matter? Obviously Scripture.
__________________ "I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."
Linear Mode
