The Founding Fathers didn't invision the Dominionist vision (they fled that mess)...does that imply that you're also anti-Founding Fathers?
The founding fathers never envisioned the monster that government has become.....except for men like Henry and a few others. In following Biblical law the government would be MUCH smaller than it is now and would be much more in line to what the founders envisioned.
__________________ "I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."
Ferd, I don't know if you were in the military or not but I was. I gave an oath to protect the Constitution from all enemies; foreign...and domestic. That would include the philosophy behind ReformedDave's theological school.
LOL! Chris, I was in the navy and served in Desert Storm.
unlike you my defence of the USA would include holding a gun in my hand.
as it relates to American Polictics, my defense of the Constitution includes voting for the good guys and speaking out against the bad guys.
this time around they are the following
John McCain (good guy)
Barak Obama (bad guy)
Hillary Clinton (bad guy)
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
ok i will give you some slack but before i give you a bear hug, you get the bop, lol,dt at least you have a sense of humor, and no i dont like anyone making fun of a decent man trying to do his best, i dont agree with gwb always but i do believe he is a decent man, dt
hey anyone can laugh at a gaff.... its when these knuclkle heads on the left start poking fun with a sharpened stick that it gets a bit tricky.
Bush cant say nuclear. Bush is an idiot (lets ignor the MBA from harvard)
John Kerry can say Gingish Kahn. Kerry is brilliant (lets forget his grades at Yale were worse than Bush's)
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
I’m pulling up a seat to ask you a question to learn more about what you believe and why. I find you very interesting, I disagree, but interesting.
As I understand it Reconstructionists (Dominionists) want to reform society into a society that reflects Biblical Law. Does this not require that gleaning laws for the poor, the poor tithe, and laws regarding the land and Jubilee also be observed? Wasn't Israel judged for neglecting these laws and denying the right of the poor?
This is a hermanutical question. As I see it taught in the NT the laws of the OT that represent in any way Christ and His coming and sacrifice(ceremonial) have been fulfilled by Christ. There is debate of just how the poor are to be taken care of but I believe that charity is to be shown. But CH, we've disagreed about this before at great length.
__________________ "I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."
LOL! Chris, I was in the navy and served in Desert Storm.
unlike you my defence of the USA would include holding a gun in my hand.
as it relates to American Polictics, my defense of the Constitution includes voting for the good guys and speaking out against the bad guys.
this time around they are the following
John McCain (good guy)
Barak Obama (bad guy)
Hillary Clinton (bad guy)
I disagree...they're all bad guys. The question is...who's telling the truth? Obama has the most sincere motives. The others are only out for power or to be pawns for special interests.
__________________
"For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for wholeness and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope." Jeremiah 29:11 (English Standard Version)
I disagree...they're all bad guys. The question is...who's telling the truth? Obama has the most sincere motives. The others are only out for power or to be pawns for special interests.
On what basis do you make the statement "Obama has the most sincere motives"?
How do you know? I would suggest you are just sucked in by a good orator.
Chris, are you saying that diety is now one of your attributes??????
LOL!!! My thoughts exactly. I think that naive statement spoke volumes about the thought processes that CH draws his conclusions from. Essentially vapor, thin air, vacuous words, the platitudes of a gifted orator.
I disagree...they're all bad guys. The question is...who's telling the truth? Obama has the most sincere motives. The others are only out for power or to be pawns for special interests.
You don't think Obama wants power or is a pawn for special interests? Of course he does and is.
I don't think he has sincere motives. He's just another politician. And quite frankly, I don't appreciate him referring to his grandma as a "typical white person." I think he has absorbed racist ideals from his racist pastor, and quiet little comments like that illustrate it.
I don't like the other candidates any better, so when faced with a lose-lose situation I'll probably vote Republican. Well, I guess I'll have to change that to a "will vote."
I'm not willing to subject our country to 4-8 years of Democratic leadership just to prove a point to the Republican party.
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone
"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."
--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
Linear Mode
