Which is More Biblical: Oneness or Triniarianism? - Page 6

missdkendall · #51 03-29-2008, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Nice post, AE! Got a message for Sunday, huh?

Send me a copy if you record it!!!!

Praxeas · #52 03-29-2008, 02:02 PM

The view of God being many joined in one in hebraic thought is actually kabbalistic.

Echad does mean one in number...in fact it is the hebrew word for the number 1

That does not mean though that God has many attributes or facets in His one being

Sam · #53 03-29-2008, 02:11 PM

6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called The Angel of His presence, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.
(Isaiah 9:6-7)

Ferd · #54 03-29-2008, 02:12 PM

There have been some really great posts in this thred. even DanA's post contained some really solid stuff.

Ronzo's post was extremely thought provoking and painted a beautiful picture of the One God.

Alter Ego's reply to Ronzo was also interesting....thought provoking and insiteful.

Sam's email that he posted here had some really great thoughts..

I do find it interesting that in all, we are on page six and there are very few straight forward answers to the question.

AE, I consider myself Oneness. I believe it is by far more biblical, and on an Apostolic forum it just seems odd to me that so few will just come out and say that.

Like my very first words to my little boy.

Here O Israel, the Lord our God is ONE.

Praxeas · #55 03-29-2008, 02:14 PM

hmmm...can't get more straight forward than "Oneness is more biblical..."

missdkendall · #56 03-29-2008, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

hmmm...can't get more straight forward than "Oneness is more biblical..."

I agree Prax. I honestly have never had to question that fact.

steve p · #57 03-29-2008, 02:19 PM

Wow! I've never studied WHICH school of thought is doctrinally correct. I haven't seen the need yet.

What I DO sense in my spirit, is that the enemy loves for us to debate, argue, get mad, and waste time on such arguments, rather than spending time EDIFYING the brethren. If I were lost and read this thread,,,I wonder what my reaction would really be toward Christianity. I'm not trying to cause trouble or sway anyone from their beliefs. Oh well.....

freeatlast · #58 03-29-2008, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferd

There have been some really great posts in this thred. even DanA's post contained some really solid stuff.

Ronzo's post was extremely thought provoking and painted a beautiful picture of the One God.

Alter Ego's reply to Ronzo was also interesting....thought provoking and insiteful.

Sam's email that he posted here had some really great thoughts..

I do find it interesting that in all, we are on page six and there are very few straight forward answers to the question.

AE, I consider myself Oneness. I believe it is by far more biblical, and on an Apostolic forum it just seems odd to me that so few will just come out and say that.

Like my very first words to my little boy.

Here O Israel, the Lord our God is ONE.

Ferd I posted this in my first post on this thread post # 10. What more do I need to say?

Ferd · #59 03-29-2008, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

hmmm...can't get more straight forward than "Oneness is more biblical..."

i didnt say none. I said not many.

Ferd · #60 03-29-2008, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freeatlast

Ferd I posted this in my first post on this thread post # 10. What more do I need to say?

absolutly nothing! you did, prax did, a couple of others did too.... but there were more than a few who didnt....

I said interesting. I didnt say you were all going to hell.