Is The Serpent Seed Doctrine A "Damnable Heresy"?

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

I never said he did. Although his 'tent vision' that according to him could not fail had not been fulfiled so many of them are yet looking for him to rise from the dead. His fault not Mark's. Branham caused this confusion NOT us.

Bro Eply.. please be corrected St. Mark said BRANHAM SAID HE WOULD RESSURECT HIMSELF -- did he say those words or not?

[JN Anderson]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

Oh St. Mark please... please.. please... in all honesty...

Bro. Branham said "when could it happen of course I know not the time, looking at the times and the visions it would be my prediciton, now this is not THUS SAITH THE LORD, this is my own understanding, I couldn't see it going past 1977"

and then he follows it up

"now dont you go tell anyone Bro. Branham said the Lord is coming in 1977, I did not"

Any person that wasnt personally involved as you and I are would read this with a reasonable mind and concur that he admits he is speaking like Paul did many times.. of his own understanding

Dual authorship is certainly compatible. However, Paul speaking and writing the Epistles is not the same as Branham preaching in 1977. Unless, you vest some canonical authority in what Branham stated. Maybe there is where the problem lies.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

Oh St. Mark please... please.. please... in all honesty...

Bro. Branham said "when could it happen of course I know not the time, looking at the times and the visions it would be my prediciton, now this is not THUS SAITH THE LORD, this is my own understanding, I couldn't see it going past 1977"

and then he follows it up

"now dont you go tell anyone Bro. Branham said the Lord is coming in 1977, I did not"

Any person that wasnt personally involved as you and I are would read this with a reasonable mind and concur that he admits he is speaking like Paul did many times.. of his own understanding

Again YOU HAVE NOT ANSWERED did Branham TEACH 1954 years or not?

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

I never said he did. Although his 'tent vision' that according to him could not fail had not been fulfiled so many of them are yet looking for him to rise from the dead. His fault not Mark's. Branham caused this confusion NOT us.

I beg the board to note Bro. Eply acknowledges he never said Bro. Branham said he would ressurect himself.. at least he is not part of a lie.. I think him for his honesty.. when in times like this its rare.....

MAKE IT CLEAR.. Bro. Eply never said Bro. Branham said he would ressurect

[StMark]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

I never said he did. Although his 'tent vision' that according to him could not fail had not been fulfiled so many of them are yet looking for him to rise from the dead. His fault not Mark's. Branham caused this confusion NOT us.

Thank you Bro Epley!

They, Branham believers ( maybe not all?) believed that he was going to rise from the dead AND they still do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND they believed that whatever he told him concerning this is the way it was


They make pilgrimages to his grave every Easter thinking " this could be the one" !

I am not making this up Vaughn and you know it

Originally Posted by Rico

If you think I am playing games then try clicking on your own link in the post. Good grief! Now I am a liar too?

Brother,, I would never stoop to the level you gentleman have and disrespect you by calling you a liar... I would just encourage you to copy and paste

[StMark]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

I beg the board to note Bro. Eply acknowledges he never said Bro. Branham said he would ressurect himself.. at least he is not part of a lie.. I think him for his honesty.. when in times like this its rare.....

MAKE IT CLEAR.. Bro. Eply never said Bro. Branham said he would ressurect

WHy then does your group Believe it?????????????????????

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Again YOU HAVE NOT ANSWERED did Branham TEACH 1954 years or not?

Brother,, I will reveal my ignorance on this subject.. I do not what you mean here.....

Originally Posted by TRFrance

Somewhat ironically, I was the one who voted "I'm not sure" to this thread's poll question.
But I almost wish I could change my vote now.

The the more I read of this Serpent Seed doctrine, the more I'm convinced that it is indeed a perverted false doctrine that should be strongly rejected.

Damnable heresy?
Indeed!

your definitly entitled to your opinion dear brother...

[Rico]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

Brother,, I would never stoop to the level you gentleman have and disrespect you by calling you a liar... I would just encourage you to copy and paste

If you had copied and pasted it correctly, then it would post as a link, DV. A link that anyone could click on and it would take them right to that page on the web. It is like me posting www.goodnewscafe.net See the blue? Click on it. It didn't do that in your post, which means some part of the web address got left out when you copied and pasted it.