I'm Confused Dr. V - Wasn't Branham a ... - Page 7

Steve Epley · #61 05-31-2008, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stmatthew

You just stated that the Laodicean Age was over, and we are now in the "BRIDE AGE". No other Age has had its prophet go beyond to the next age. So The church age Branham was a prophet in is over, and now we must have a prophet for this age.

Matthew is on a roll today! Very good. Dr.Vaughn you made the statement or repeated it from Branham so it is you turn?

#62 05-31-2008, 12:19 PM

Bro. Eply.... were you in the Apostolic movement before Branham or another religion?

Praxeas · #63 05-31-2008, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

I never said I would or could show scriptures for running "isle"...I can and did show scripture for shouting and jumping. I already tried to engage you in the tongues issue but you blew me off like you have most of my points and counter arguments.

Simply put the bible does not outlaw rejoicing or expressions of joy.
Nobody denies church is a place to learn and be edified and perfected, but you are asserting something that is simply NOT proven by you. That a service is to be void of expressions of worship, worship and praise, singing and rejoicing, prayers and ministering to both physical and spiritual needs of the saints as well as ministering to the unlearned visitors

Bump for the Dr

Brother Price · #64 05-31-2008, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

Bro. Eply.... were you in the Apostolic movement before Branham or another religion?

Nice side step, but you did not answer questions posed to you.

Praxeas · #65 05-31-2008, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Price

Nice side step, but you did not answer questions posed to you.

he's been two steppin his way around a LOT of good points and counter arguments....and then obfuscating everything by starting yet another topic that he can't keep track of.

Joelel · #66 05-31-2008, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

He is not well esteemed because he rejected the "evidence doctrine". He also taught predestination and annihilation of the wicked, both which I believe are true.

I also believe predestination because the word teaches it but,how do you believe it is the question ?

Joelel · #67 05-31-2008, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

I am as well .... but not in the modern term... I speak in tongues and have the gifts of the SPirit.. but the word Pentecostal has been hijacked by a bunch of NOISE & FLESH.. this was NOT the original Pentecost....

So you think a person shouldn't do anything unless the Holy Ghost moves them ?

Joelel · #68 05-31-2008, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Right a Laodicean church!

Maybe he was correct the Laodicean messenger to his Laodicean church.

They fitted each other it was a real spiritual lighthouse I tell you!

How many services have you been at there that oasis in the desert!

The word teaches me the apostles and prophets are the foundation of the church and started the assemblies and kept athority over them. Oops.

Joelel · #69 05-31-2008, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rico

The NT church didn't chunk the OT into the trash. In fact, the OT is all they had to reference. That's why it's referred to so much in the NT. Now, God either likes for His people to make a loud joyful noise when they praise Him or David was a big fat liar.

Wrong ,they had the teaching of Jesus written in their heart,then the Holy Ghost continued to teach them. Amen

Rico · #70 05-31-2008, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joelel

Wrong ,they had the teaching of Jesus written in their heart,then the Holy Ghost continued to teach them. Amen

Joelel, when I said the OT was all they had as reference, I was referring to established scripture. I was not suggesting they had no other guide to lead them. The NT confirms that they did not pitch the OT in the trash because it is, in fact, constantly referred to in the epistles. Jesus Himself referred to them.