Quote:
Originally Posted by tbpew
Well Dan, since as is so often the case, I must fill in your answer to a direct question (and then the repeating of that question in a subsequent post)....
I am very glad that you would never view any board's oversight efforts to curtail unfriendly or disrespectful engagement as censorship.
So, by extension, if the admin's efforts have not been censorship, it seems reasonable and consistent that any poster whose motive is to highlight their perception of unfriendly or uncomely speech, they ALSO are not seeking to censor speech.
I guess censorship is in the eyes of beholder.
|
If that is the motive ... and if they are consistently practicing what they are vehemently opposing.
But the matter of fact is ... is that admittedly many of these crusaders view my postings as a threat to their existence and influence.
We can disagree on the impact of those posts ... but that feeling has also been expressed in this thread ...
Just query the word "agenda" in this thread and a safe inference can be drawn.
Matter of perception ... although your argument is sound if all premises are true, albeit verbose.