Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam
IB came for a three night series of prophecy teaching at the Covenant Apostolic Church in Cincinnati several years ago. I only went one night. I personally do not agree with his teaching on a post-tribulation rapture. That local church had a weekly tv program and on one of their programs they presented some of IB's teaching that he had given. He came out very strongly against the trinity doctrine and for baptism in Jesus' name. I did not see the program but my wife did and told me about it.
|
This was obviously at an Apostolic church ... yet it seems when dealing w/ the rest of mainstream Christianity via the web, prophetic conferences at a neutral venue, or radio.... the main message is Jesus Christ ... not
Acts 2:38 ... (WHICH OF COURSE I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH BUT MANY HERE ,AND APPARENTLY I.B. TOO, DON'T THINK THAT'S THE FULL GOSPEL)
Here is an hour long broadcast on Christ's Imminent Return within the next 10 years and there are no desperate pleas to save the hundreds of churched listeners ... rather they are seen as partners and co-laborers in his ministry ... taking the message of Jesus Christ and directing them to Endtime ministries...
How does one talk about the rapture for over an hour and not give the solution?
This was Thursday's radio broadcast:
http://www.endtime.com/archive/ram/et06-26-08.ram
I know some of the moderates on this forum would rather defend this .... but surely there are some cons here that have a problem with this apparent BLATANT contradiction?????
I'm sorry but something has to give here ... no???
No offers on how to be born again but plenty on how to give again??
Even as a liberal I'd like to see someone who is speaking on the end of the world to discuss the "Good News".
I vowed years ago never to teach and preach without somehow mentioning His Sacrifice and Resurrection in each message.
Give me Billy Graham or Steve Epley ... at least I know I'll get a Gospel message and that God desires a response.
I want my Gospel raw w/ no pussyfooting.