Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaBishop
You know good and well what the issue is here and your skirting it. The issue is - They DID NOT make an issue out of the clothes and you do. You have seen the pictures and you guys just cannot deny that your forefathers and their wives wore jewelry and dressed the fashions of the day. They Haney's did it, The Stars did it, the Urshans did it and most of those that came out of the A/G did it and then the Conservatives took over the movement and now you have all these silly rules that most of you can't live by past the city limits you pastor in. Wanna know how I know - I lived with you guys for 20 years - I KNOW you!
|
Whatever. More of your twisted dribble. Can you now go back and coherently read my post? Is that too much to ask?
True or false? The early 1900's found the majority of society dressing conservatively?
Tru or false? The Wesleyan holiness taught drab dress?
True or false? Goss had no issue with fashionable dress?
I'll still guarantee you that Goss dressed fashionable but modest.
The biggest difference I see is that those in the early 1900's wore jewlery.
And why don't you refrain from telling me I am skirting the issue, please? That is the same school of thought, by your own definitions on the Sam ordeal, as calling me a liar.
(Try that one on for size.)
Threaded Mode
