Quote:
Originally Posted by stmatthew
Friend,
I believe you have hit on the irritation that most conservatives feel. This has already come before the GB, and has been voted on and defeated. Meaning that the majority agree's with what the bylaws currently state. I for one believe the division is not coming from the Cons, but from those liberal UPC ministers that just will not take NO for an answer. They, in my opinion, are just trying to continue to cut away what is established little by little until they have what they want. If the resolution is voted on this year, and defeated again, I can assure you we will see another attempt within a few years time.
The sad fact is, some are just blatantly defying the bylaws, and doing what they want anyway. So much for ethics and integrity.
|
Sir,
Whether a resolution has been voted on in the past in any organization ... even in Congress ... it does not mean it died.
If the resolution committee resurrect sthis resolution has allowed it ... it's because the process is legitimate and within legality.
If someone does not like resolutions having a second or third life than examine the resolution process ... don't slam the rest of the body ... for voting on said resolution again ... as compromisers or anti-holiness
Threaded Mode
