AFF apostolic or not?

[Hoovie]

Originally Posted by pelathais

Depends on the socks. The selection of men's hosiery will make or break any outfit.

I was saving this for when I post the pictures.... but I was wearing those short pants at Disney a couple weeks ago (No hosiery and mickey Mouse Crocs) and a girl/lady asked me to DANCE! I tried to talk my way out of it... but my sweet Conservative UPC wife said - DO IT!

Did I sin?

Is there repentance to be found??

More later - with the pictures!

[LadyCoonskinner]

Originally Posted by Berkeley

They are short-pants. Bout as long as a knee length skirt.


-respectfully

There's a difference in MEN and 'WOMEN'S appearal.

[StMark]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Less and less Apostolic all the time.

Yea I have to agree. IMO the majority of this forum
is now more Charismatic then Pentecostal

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by LadyCoonskinner

There's a difference in MEN and 'WOMEN'S appearal.

Why do women get to show their calves?

A male is more likely to be enticed by a womans calf, than a woman enticed by a mans calf... guy legs are ugly.

[StMark]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

And then there are those that think it is hot when it hits 80....they usually live by the ocean

The Bay area was nice - similar to your temps

[Hoovie]

Originally Posted by LadyCoonskinner

There's a difference in MEN and 'WOMEN'S appearal.

Right. Even common sense tells us a woman's leg ... oh wait that won't hold water...

[LadyCoonskinner]

Originally Posted by Berkeley

Why do women get to show their calves?

A male is more likely to be enticed by a womans calf, than a woman enticed by a mans calf... guy legs are ugly.

That's why they need to be covered!!!!

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by pelathais

Hmmm... I just went over there and found 15 users while there are 59 online here at AFF now.

Does that mean there are less "True" Apostolics than us heathens?

[Tim Rutledge]

Originally Posted by StMark

Yea I have to agree. IMO the majority of this forum
is now more Charismatic then Pentecostal

I agree. Much more.

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by Tim Rutledge

Peter wasn't a tongue talker yet. Catholic? Council of Nicea was when?

The apostles used the Septuagint. You use the Jewish Masoretic text. Today, the only Bibles in the English language that use the Septuagint are the Roman Catholic Bibles.

That's the reason the RCC (and the Eastern Orthodox churches) uses the Septuagint - they claim to be "Apostolic."

If you want to be "Apostolic" why don't you use the same Bible as the original Apostles? Why? Because the Reformers didn't want to use the same Bible as the RCC.

And so we have a very powerful tradition that seperates us from the 1st century church. A tradition that we will never overcome and become more "Apostolic."

And what's "tongue talking" got to do with fishing? Are you saying that he somehow gave up the culture in which he was raised? There were no women around out on the boat so "naked" meant that you didn't get your clothes smelly - it was just practical. And besides, even in his "fisher's coat" that he put on to be with Jesus, he would have fallen well short of of our holiness standards. And what about the beards that everyone wore?