|
Re: Letter from Bro. Chester Wright to Bro. Haney
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amos
I do like you.
I also know some things I won't share on an internet forum.
None of these things have to do with his "character," which is, as far as I know, beyond reproach.
But when a man starts teaching things that I believe are unscriptural, that's where I get off.
When we talk about sin in terms of a preacher, we usually think of some moral failure.
I refuse to give room for that kind of false accusation, so while I believe teaching false doctrine is sin, I avoid that kind of language in a setting like this because of the possibility of it being misconstrued.
And yes, I believe the man in question is moving away from old time Pentecost, including some standards that I believe are Biblical essentials.
I also have doubts about where he stands on the essentiality of the New Birth.
I hesitate to say more, and maybe shouldn't have said that much.
|
Fair enough. That's why I brought the conversation to light.
I guess what puzzles me is that you seem to have made a distinction between "false doctrine" and "sin". I've never thought the two to be mutually exclusive.
__________________
"Many people view their relationship with God like a "color by number" picture. It's easier to let someone else define the boundaries, tell them which blanks to fill in, and what color to use than it is for them to take a blank canvas and seek inspiration from the Source in order to paint their own masterpiece"
|